It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
01. Public and Private spaces
Public spaces, and all of their occupants, are completely open and fair game to photographers. Sidewalks, roads, beaches, parks, museums, even malls, are all considered public property. As such, your focus (the person or thing you're photographing) has no expectation of privacy when they use them. As long as you and your subject are both on public property, take the picture.
Certain places like Malls and Museums can actually be considered private property rather than public property. Here in my local area there are two malls owned by a private corporation. While the buildings are open to public access, they're still considered "private property." It would appear that you're welcome to take pictures as you please, but if the property owner requests cessation of the activity you have to cooperate. That does't mean they can delete images or confiscate your gear, but it means they can ask you to stop and maybe even escort you from the premises. Have you found that to be the case in your research?
Second, if you are approached by security/police/owners and told not to photograph a private space, you are obligated to obey them, and cease taking pictures in that instance. However, they are not allowed to confiscate your camera, your film, any of your possessions, or you yourself.
Second, if the owner, or one of their employees, approaches you asking you not to do so. For areas like malls you can ask to see the documentation prohibiting photography. If they produce it, abide by it. If they cannot, ask to speak to the owner, and get clarification that it is, indeed, against the policies of the area. As a rule of thumb, I always request areas post said documentation afterward, to avoid further hassle with other photographers like myself.
Also, it would seem that any subject in plain view of a photographer on public property is considered fair game as well, even if they are on private property. That's a little different than what your indicating, but it falls under the same sort of precedence as the plain view doctrine law enforcement relies on. i think it's wise to clear up the fact that I can take your picture if I'm standing on a public sidewalk and you're standing on a private lawn. I do believe there are ethical and legal concerns when it comes to peeping in windows and over walls though, but that's just from my understanding of things that I've looked in to. Again, have you found the same types of things in your research?
Originally posted by Wandering Scribe
02. Posted private property
First, any time that a sign is posted prohibiting photography, you are obligated to follow the signs command and not photograph that space. If you are on public property though, you may photograph what is in plain view.
Originally posted by Wandering Scribe
I was just participating in another thread, and came to the realization that photography laws are greatly misunderstood around here.