Russian Forces to Provide “Security” At US Events

Russian Forces to Provide “Security” At US Events

As part of a deal signed last week in Washington DC between the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry and FEMA, Russian officials will provide “security at mass events” in the United States, a scenario that won’t sit well with Americans wary of foreign assets operating on US soil.

According to a press release by the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense and Emergencies, US and Russian officials met on June 25 at the 17th Joint U.S.-Russia Cooperation Committee on Emergency Situations.

www.infowars.com...

Now before you all go crazy and say blah blah Infowars / Alex Jones just keep on reading for a few seconds. Yes, infowars is well known to hype up things to get views, but usually there is a grain of truth to be gathered if you are willing to look.

Yes, FEMA and the Russian Ministry of Emergency has signed agreements in which allows each country to help one another in the case of a declared emergency.

en.mchs.ru...


There have been other events in the past that create legal precedent for the use of foreign troops on American soil:

Canada, U.S. agree to use each other’s troops in civil emergencies
www.canada.com...

Not to mention the police in the states is vastly becoming a paramilitary unit.

So nothing to worry about? What say you?

Im glad, we need all the help we can get so the cave dwelling terrorist don’t get us.

Sarc/ off


SHTF is coming, be ready

I find it very troubling.

Remember back to the Tianamen Square protests. The guy in front of the tank.

The Chinese had trouble putting down the protests, apparently because the troops that they had on hand at the time did not want to shoot their own people.

The Chinese govt solved the problem by bringing in Mongolian troops that had no problem with gunning down civilians.

Maybe the Russian troops wouldn't have any problem shooting American rioters.

Just as troubling is the fact that I live in Pennsylvania, which is in FEMA Zone III. That is where they say the troops will be used, as it encompasses Washington, DC.

reply to post by MidnightTide
If this is true all I can say is WTF??? Why on Earth would we ever need Russians to assist in rescue or any other types of operations on American soil in a disaster situation? Any time there has been a disaster situation in the US American citizens show up by the truckload to lend a helping hand. I can understand having such an agreement with Canada as they are our neighbors and neighbors help each other out in times of need , but Russians?

In order to have Russians available to aid in an "emergency" situation it would require that large numbers of Russians be based here as by the time any of them traveled here from Russia the worst part of any emergency would be past. Is this just an excuse to bring thousands of Russian soldiers here in preparedness for an orchestrated agenda? Call me paranoid, but my conspiracy alarm bells are sounding off left and right!

reply to post by littled16


Well it's Further proof Russia is under the control of the TPTB

So are these Russian forces going to be in charge of our local police departments? I don't like this at all. I wouldn't want the FBI controlling our local police departments let alone foreign police forces. The cops around here can handle things, we don't need a bunch of overeducated specialists coming in disrupting the cops. If the government wants to help, make sure that when the cops stick someone in jail because they keep breaking into homes that they stay in jail for their whole sentence. Maybe the feds can get rid of the lawyers that get kids off without learning their lesson.

So we trash can our Space Program to hitch rides with the Russians at their pleasure and on their terms. Now we're going to outsource security needs to the Russian Federation? This is the same Russia that we're facing off with in a proxy fight over Syria right? The same Russia that is hiding Snowden against all pleas from Washington, right?


I wonder... Next President? Can we get someone for an American leader who puts AMERICA first? This one seems loyal to the Muslim Brotherhood, Russia, Africa and just about everyone ELSE in the world....except the ONE nation he's supposed to be representing and serving.

BTW... I grew up to see and treat a armed Russian in uniform as a dire and deadly threat to my well being and the security of my nation. It was so learned and will be followed faithfully to this day. They've done NOTHING to stop being an outright threat to be dealt with, should the Russian flag appear on the shoulder of armed men down my street.

That's simple cause and effect right there. If Obama wants to invite Russians to police us? I invite him to carry his sorry butt out of the nation he no longer represents, serves or Faithfully protects. He's violated his oath, his nation and our collective security.

This is a great idea! This way people will be used to have foreign troops on their soil to 'help' and it will make the transition to a global government much easier.

Seriously? Things like this make me shake my head in disgust.

Originally posted by littled16
reply to post by MidnightTide

 

If this is true all I can say is WTF??? Why on Earth would we ever need Russians to assist in rescue or any other types of operations on American soil in a disaster situation? Any time there has been a disaster situation in the US American citizens show up by the truckload to lend a helping hand. I can understand having such an agreement with Canada as they are our neighbors and neighbors help each other out in times of need , but Russians?

In order to have Russians available to aid in an "emergency" situation it would require that large numbers of Russians be based here as by the time any of them traveled here from Russia the worst part of any emergency would be past. Is this just an excuse to bring thousands of Russian soldiers here in preparedness for an orchestrated agenda? Call me paranoid, but my conspiracy alarm bells are sounding off left and right!

Yeahp, Just checked a map,. Russia is right next to Alaska. They are our neighbors too.

English is not my native language ,but am i wrong in reading from this :

In addition, the parties approved of U.S.-Russian cooperation in this field in 2013-2014, which envisages exchange of experience including in monitoring and forecasting emergency situations, training of rescuers, development of mine-rescuing and provision of security at mass events.

that exchange of experience about provision of security at mass effects is being agreed upon,and not provision of security itself?

reply to post by christoph

Yeahp, Just checked a map,. Russia is right next to Alaska. They are our neighbors too.

Big difference between the neighbor who shares a border thousands of miles long with us and is right next door and a neighbor who is across a sea from our most outer land and on a completely different continent. Not to mention I've never heard of Canada aiming nuclear missiles at us. I would lend any of the neighbors on my block any tool in my garage, the neighbors a few miles down the road near the end of the street- not so much.

reply to post by ZeroKnowledge


vague terminology can be interrupted in so many ways, why do you think they do this.....

reply to post by rickymouse






I can see this happening with Russian Troops

Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge

 

vague terminology can be interrupted in so many ways, why do you think they do this.....

Yes press release is vague, and i can't find original protocol of the meeting on the net. But i just can't see Russian forces providing security in US or vice versa. No sovereign nation will agree to that. Add to that current negative trend between Russia and US. And if it is just smoke and mirrors then knowingly publishing document that reveals it all is really dumb.

Originally posted by ZeroKnowledge
English is not my native language ,but am i wrong in reading from this :

In addition, the parties approved of U.S.-Russian cooperation in this field in 2013-2014, which envisages exchange of experience including in monitoring and forecasting emergency situations, training of rescuers, development of mine-rescuing and provision of security at mass events.

that exchange of experience about provision of security at mass effects is being agreed upon,and not provision of security itself?

English may not be your native language, but you surely can read it very well. That is exactly what it says. They will share experience, not actually provide security.
Much if the information needed for the first H bomb came from Edward Teller, a Hungarian. Infowars would report that under the headline "Hungary to arm US with H bombs."

Do TPTB really fear that much civil unrest in U.S.A??? If so, it would be the perfect move to make in order to prepare for such a thing. It also proves that TPTB has power of Russia which leads me to think that this TPTB might have power over the two nations and thats why this kind of "deal" would be made.




Thruthseek3r

I have but one word for this... WOLVERINES!!!

(The cool 80's version, not the sissified re-make)

Originally posted by butcherguy
I find it very troubling.

Remember back to the Tianamen Square protests. The guy in front of the tank.

The Chinese had trouble putting down the protests, apparently because the troops that they had on hand at the time did not want to shoot their own people.

The Chinese govt solved the problem by bringing in Mongolian troops that had no problem with gunning down civilians.

Maybe the Russian troops wouldn't have any problem shooting American rioters.

Just as troubling is the fact that I live in Pennsylvania, which is in FEMA Zone III. That is where they say the troops will be used, as it encompasses Washington, DC.

Bingo. Forget soverignty and think about Stalin's taking troops out of Uzbekistan and
sticking them in the Ukraine, Russians to the Yamchatka, nobody on the ground had
a problem working the civvies when they were "that different".
Heck when you think about it.. we've had Army and other recruiting offices in Mexico,
Panama, and quite a few other places for years. So the details get easy... maybe too easy.

Originally posted by 35Foxtrot
I have but one word for this... WOLVERINES!!!

(The cool 80's version, not the sissified re-make)

Oh, yes indeed. I watched the original Red Dawn when I was in my formative years. Very good movie. Not terribly realistic in so far as the Russians would have just burned the whole forest down to get the rebels...lol

Other than that? It's still among my favorites. I never did watch the remake. I think I'll just keep my memory of the first one. I doubt it could have been made better.

I'd heard rumors and seen a lengthy story in Soldier of Fortune with photos in the 90's of Americans along side Russians in Chechnya's urban warfare and house clearing. As I recall, the story had been along the lines of our people learning how it's done in one of the few places it was happening at the time. I wish I'd kept old issues.. It stood out at the time and since, obviously to have mentioned. That was with their side in their own version of Iraq though. That wasn't Americans in Vladivostok or St Petersburg. I can't imagine anyone thinking this could ever be a good idea. Then again, that covers much that's happening recently.

Originally posted by ZeroKnowledge

Originally posted by MidnightTide
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge

 

vague terminology can be interrupted in so many ways, why do you think they do this.....

Yes press release is vague, and i can't find original protocol of the meeting on the net. But i just can't see Russian forces providing security in US or vice versa. No sovereign nation will agree to that. Add to that current negative trend between Russia and US. And if it is just smoke and mirrors then knowingly publishing document that reveals it all is really dumb.

Your English is fine. Which is why you'll understand the old saying, 'give them an inch, and they'll take a mile'. It's the Saul Alinski method. A little push here, a nudge there. Get us used to what used to be unheard of, then take the next small step.

Think of it this way. And I state this simply to compare the escalation of numbers, nothing more. But in our time in Vietnam, we started with a few dozen advisers. Then a few hundred, then a few thousand. Next we knew, we had hundreds of thousands of troops there, and were fighting their war.

I do not believe the vast majority of US troops will shoot on US citizens. Foreign troops won't have the concerns about family and friends in the area of conflict.

And to directly answer a comment you made. This country is no longer a sovereign nation. It's a dictatorship. Most just haven't figured that out yet. Or are in fearful denial.