It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The new appointee for Attorney General, to replace John Ashcroft, is none other than Alberto Gonzales, the Bush advisor who helped write the draconian, human rights-suppressive Patriot Act, who has supported the use of torture by our troops in Iraq and in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and who calls the Geneva Conventions for human rights of prisoners, “Quaint”! Alberto Gonzales is also a member of LaRaza, a notoriously militant group that plans a take-over of the Southwestern United States by Mexico. (See www.villagevoice.com/issues/0448/hentoff.php)
An astonishing event was recorded on November 27, 2004, when a person in Laguna Hills, California (NOT a predominantly Latino community) received a notice of a parking violation. The California-produced parking ticket had as its FIRST language - Spanish! English was the SECOND language! (www.rense.com/general160ticket.htm)
It is clear that the merger of the U.S. and Mexico is well on its way.
To the North, the merger of Canada with the U.S. is progressing rapidly. In November, 2004, President George W. Bush spoke publicly of combining the military of Canada and the United States. In fact, the actual “Annexation of Canada” by the U.S. has been discussed. (www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO411C.html)
On September 6, 2004, the Alberta provincial government released a report promoting massive government infrastructure spending to facilitate exploitation of the oil sands north of Edmonton. The following day, U.S. and Canadian mass media ran features endorsing the essence of the report. The national daily USA Today longingly headlined their article: “Canada drips with oil!” The USA Today article continued, “With oil prices bounding to nearly $50 a barrel this summer, both the Bush and Kerry campaigns have been talking up the Canadian option. Both extol a U.S. energy policy that draws more supply from friendly, familiar Canada and less from the volatile Middle East.”
In fact, the direct investment under U.S. control in the Alberta tar sands alone is “equivalent to the combined spending of American companies in China over the past 25 years,” according to USA Today. It is clear that “the U.S. multinationals are moving to seize and loot fabulous new deposits in Alberta’s oil sands, richer than Saudi Arabia, and make Canadians subsidize the theft,” writes K. C. Adams in Discovery Magazine.
Re-zoning the World: The Merging of the Americas in a New Global Order” is the title of an October 5, 2003 article by Carl Teichrib, a highly respected freelance researcher and authoritative write on issues pertaining to globalization. He writes:
“One of the first major political events that President Bush was involved in when he took office was the Summit of the Americas, which was held in Quebec City, April 20-22, 2001. It was a noted occasion; America’s newest president was swinging into action with one of his main campaign platforms - an expanded trade program which would revitalize America’s slumping economy.
“Ironically, this 'vigorously pursued’ economic agenda is not the brainchild of the current administration. Bush’s push for hemispherical free trade was first expounded by his father, Bush Sr., who announced the Enterprise of the Americas Initiative on June 27, 1990. Moreover, this trans-continental restructuring agenda was not placed into high gear by a Republican, but by a Democrat - President Bill Clinton. (There’s NO difference between the Republicans and Democrats. Their ultimate agenda is the same - A One World Government!)
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by Bilk22
313.9 million Americans vs. one little president. The odds are quite astounding. To be the losing party with such unfathomable odds, at least some stupidity is at work here.
How stupid do they think we are?,
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
reply to post by Bilk22
313.9 million Americans vs. one little president. The odds are quite astounding. To be the losing party with such unfathomable odds, at least some stupidity is at work here.
Originally posted by Bilk22
They push the surveillance and data collecting stuff down our throats and in the next breath, tell us we don't need stronger border security. I guess we're to assume terrorists are too stupid to cross the borders illegally to gain entrance to their target. Or, is the truth of the matter, we really face no threat from terrorism and the surveillance is for something other than what they're saying? Their positions on these two matters are not congruous. So which is it Congress? Which is it Mr. President?edit on 18-6-2013 by Bilk22 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by Bilk22
"As you said, if they were so concerned about terrorists from foreign countries getting into the US, how come the southern border is pretty much wide open..........."
We have four borders. The southern border is the most heavily guarded. If someone wants to come in by sea, or through the great north woods, they will find little resistance as long as they don't call attention to themselves. Stop buying the RWNJ mantra about the southern border.