Nibiru Sunrise? Or just a lense flare? Two suns? 3?

I got up, used the bathroom, saw an amazing sunrise and filmed it.
Never before has a sunrise I have filmed shown what is shown this time.
It was 15 June, and I am pretty much convinced on what I think now.
What do you think?

video

What do you think?

I don't think Nibiru exists.

reply to post by Phage


What are your thoughts on this footage?

reply to post by imd12c4funn


Nope, no Nibirus here.
Lens flare and reflections from the glass.
At least you didn't add annoying music to it.

Originally posted by Phage
I don't think Nibiru exists.

nibiru exist..but in another galaxy not milkyway..

reply to post by imd12c4funn

No wonder we have beautiful sunset in Bellevue -
we have two suns! (Internal reflection - through a double glazed window)

thebellevueguy-bryan.blogspot.com...

reply to post by watchitburn


So the brightness causes a reflection?

Why is everything else not causing a flare or reflection

?
the cloud linings are bright as well, but no reflection?

You may be right, but I am not convinced.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by imd12c4funn

 

No wonder we have beautiful sunset in Bellevue -
we have two suns! (Internal reflection - through a double glazed window)

thebellevueguy-bryan.blogspot.com...

edit on 6/17/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)

A still image?

If so, what causes the reflection to be away from the sun rather that merged with it?

reply to post by imd12c4funn

A still image?

Yes. Video cameras see reflections the same way still cameras do.

If so, what causes the reflection to be away from the sun rather that merged with it?

It has to do with something called "angles of incidence".

There is no Nibiru. There are not two Suns.

reply to post by Phage


Can we agree that it is at least interesting footage?
The way the cloud looks like something melting over the sun(s)?

One last question.

Would this "angles of incidence" also cause the anomaly of the 2nd orb to look like clouds are covering more of ot that the source of the "reflection"?


reference at 57 seconds

reply to post by imd12c4funn

Can we agree that it is at least interesting footage?

No.

Would this "angles of incidence" also cause the anomaly of the 2nd orb to look like clouds are covering more of ot that the source of the "reflection"?

Yes. Because the reflection is not as bright as its source so does not saturate the sensor of the camera.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by imd12c4funn

 

Can we agree that it is at least interesting footage?

No.

Would this "angles of incidence" also cause the anomaly of the 2nd orb to look like clouds are covering more of ot that the source of the "reflection"?

Yes. Because the reflection is not as bright as its source so does not saturate the sensor of the camera.

Well, thank you for your input.
I wished for a different first answer though.

reply to post by imd12c4funn


I think (*correction - I know*) we would all have seen it by now.

If you really think this is Nibiru then you need help but my guess is that you are bored and hoping that people who also believe in Nibiru will jump on board so that a large argument ensues between the normal people and the 'end is nigh' folk resulting in many, many stars and page views.

Most of us are wiser than that and Phage has given you the correct answer. You might as well give up now and save yourself the embarrassment.

reply to post by imd12c4funn

reply to post by imd12c4funn


While I am not so quick to dismiss the validity that Nibiru exist, your video is hardly evidence worthy, the quality was shoddy as far as the overall camera work is concerned. I am sure you are not a professional so that is to be understood and forgiven. Might I suggest a tripod set up for the next time, if it really is Nibiru then it should stand to reason that it would show up again.

some news stories that maybe of interest- Huge List of Planet X Stories Dating Back to the 50s!