The Reason Why The USA Has Decided to Directly Support the Rebels (Assad Attacking Aleppo)

Earlier today, it was reported that the USA would provide the rebels fighting in Syria's civil war, military support.

THE United States dramatically toughened its line on Syria, accusing it of using chemical weapons and promising military aid to the opposition, as regime forces battle rebels in Aleppo city. President Barack Obama's administration announced on Thursday it had conducted a review of intelligence reports and concluded that Syrian regime forces had used banned arms, including sarin nerve gas, in attacks that killed up to 150 people.

www.news.com.au...

Prior to this announcement, it was unknown as to which forces in Syria had used chemical weapons. Further, the USA has always been apprehensive in supplying equipment to the rebels, as they are heavily supported by terrorists.

Now, the USA has done a U-turn, claiming that evidence suggests that Assad's regime has used Sarin gas to kill up to 150 people, and as such, they are looking to aid the rebels militarily. This may seem odd, but it is actually more interesting than what is being let on.

About 24 hours ago, Syrian President, Bashar Al Assad had ordered the military to attack the critical stronghold of the Rebels, the city of Aleppo:

OPERATION Northern Storm, a "harsh and swift" Syrian military campaign to retake the northern city of Aleppo from rebels, is expected to begin in the next few days, a Western diplomat said yesterday.

Syrian forces have been ordered to start an attack on the key rebel bastion on Sunday or Monday and will begin choking off supply routes this weekend, according to regime insiders and regional experts.

www.theaustralian.com.au...

While the USA does not want to get directly involved in the conflict, they fear that the city of Aleppo would be taken by Assad's forces, effectively winning the war.

What Carney conveyed on behalf of the president was that while stopping the battle for Aleppo was crucially important in terms of the Syrian war, intervention was not in the interests of the United States.

www.debka.com...

But while they are not going to get directly involved, they believe that Assad forces would need 2 months to take control of the city and its surrounding territories. Providing military support to the rebels right now, just before Assad attacks Aleppo seems too convenient in that they do not want the city to fall, but do not want to enter the war directly either...

Yes, it's such a coincidence isn't it!

Assad looks to be in 'danger' of putting down the terrorists attacking his country and people, and 'poof' all of a sudden there's a juicy excuse presenting itself literally on the eve of THE decisive campaign that will put and end to the manufactured 'rebellion'.

The US and UK plotters know that if Assad takes the stronghold, their chances of using a tamed Syria as a stepping stone to Iran disolves overnight..so magically, even though Assad and his army has absolutely ZERO reason to use CW when he has conventional arms a plenty, and is clearly capable of taking care of murdering terrorists (as he's almost won) and about to deliver them their marching orders..we hear that the US suddenly accuses him of using them!

As i say, what an opportune coincidence for the West eh?

Same as 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden was an opportunity to attack Afghanistan, except Bin Laden was NEVER wanted for 9/11, contrary to the US repeating he was responsible for it.

Same as Iraq, and the sexed up dossier claiming the UK would be hit by Iraqi WMDs such as nukes and CW with just 40 minutes warning...strangely, none were ever found, and no evidence was found they had ever existed...the report or 'sexed up dossier' was based on a decade old high school thesis for crying out loud!

Same as Libya, and the 'monster ghadaffi' commiting genocide against his own people...or..was he?

Turns out, the Libyan people were given far more from the Libyan state under Ghadaffi, than any of the citizens get in the West...virtually free fuel and energy, 50% state contribution to buying a home, free education and University places, free healthcare, a state contribution or gift when Libyans got married and the list went on.

Not such a monster after all then. The banks set up shop in Libya before Ghadaffis body was even cold, so not a total loss then!

And now we have Syria...are we noticing a pattern..yet?

reply to post by MysterX


Couldn't agree with you more mate!!!

Now Syria is the ones who has the wmd's.... And we are believing this lie again?
Where is that picture of the Picard facepalm??
We buy the same lies time after time after time, when will we figure things out and hang our traitors?

reply to post by MysterX


My opinion mirrors MysterX' opinions on the matter, and I whole heartedly agree with what you say about libya, gaddafi was a great competent leader.

Originally posted by MysterX
Yes, it's such a coincidence isn't it!

Assad looks to be in 'danger' of putting down the terrorists attacking his country and people, and 'poof' all of a sudden there's a juicy excuse presenting itself literally on the eve of THE decisive campaign that will put and end to the manufactured 'rebellion'.

The US and UK plotters know that if Assad takes the stronghold, their chances of using a tamed Syria as a stepping stone to Iran disolves overnight..so magically, even though Assad and his army has absolutely ZERO reason to use CW when he has conventional arms a plenty, and is clearly capable of taking care of murdering terrorists (as he's almost won) and about to deliver them their marching orders..we hear that the US suddenly accuses him of using them!

As i say, what an opportune coincidence for the West eh?

Same as 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden was an opportunity to attack Afghanistan, except Bin Laden was NEVER wanted for 9/11, contrary to the US repeating he was responsible for it.

Same as Iraq, and the sexed up dossier claiming the UK would be hit by Iraqi WMDs such as nukes and CW with just 40 minutes warning...strangely, none were ever found, and no evidence was found they had ever existed...the report or 'sexed up dossier' was based on a decade old high school thesis for crying out loud!

Same as Libya, and the 'monster ghadaffi' commiting genocide against his own people...or..was he?

Turns out, the Libyan people were given far more from the Libyan state under Ghadaffi, than any of the citizens get in the West...virtually free fuel and energy, 50% state contribution to buying a home, free education and University places, free healthcare, a state contribution or gift when Libyans got married and the list went on.

Not such a monster after all then. The banks set up shop in Libya before Ghadaffis body was even cold, so not a total loss then!

And now we have Syria...are we noticing a pattern..yet?

YEAH what HE/SHE says!!

ditto for me, i really want to found a tropical paradise and populate with ATS

"Rebels"