It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
Originally posted by FlyersFan
firstly the term "cracker" will never hold as much weight a the "n word".
Because people give it a free pass when in fact the hate behind that word is just as deep.
Yeah, years of being enslaved, forced to use different amenities, get served last in shops, sit at the back of the bus, and step off the sidewalk when a white person passes, that stuff is definitely almost as bad as, um, having to whip black people for not working hard enough.
Originally posted by RickKilgannon
Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply anymore
Originally posted by Faust100f
Travon Martin deserved what he got, he should not have been in the area, he was the racist as evidenced by his comment and his killer was NOT a "white cracker" he was hispanic. Zimmerman is innocent, lets see the gang banger pictures and the gold tooth which depicts Martin, instead of the little kid in a football uniform. Adios Amigos. John
Originally posted by Faust100f
How many black people do you know that are whipped for not working!
Equal Opportunity legislation was a give away for those who did not want to compete in this country under standards which had existed for hundreds of years.
The Best person qualified for a job or education should be hired regardless of race. However that legislation, removed that measurement for excellence in our country and tried to "equalize" everyone. Those that paid the price, worked hard, sacrificed to better themselves were denied jobs, education and government benefits because they were not the right color.
Do not throw out the "Red Herring" that blacks deserve anything from our country. If you were to look at the Mexicans, Vietnamese et.al., they seem to blend in and understand the importance of self reliance. This characteristic is completely missing in the Black Community.
Any black high school graduate can get granted to any University in this Country and will get a free ride scholarship. That is what is wrong with this country, everyone wants everything given to them, nothing is worked for anymore. This legislation was successful in dumbing down our entire population.
I think it is time to put everyone on a level playing field based upon brains, talent, and education, not skin color. Fortunately, the majority of wealth held in this country is held by those who believed in the old standards of risk taking and bettering themselves, instead of relying upon government to send them a monthly check and baby them from cradle to grave.
Travon Martin deserved what he got, he should not have been in the area,
Zimmerman is innocent, lets see the gang banger pictures and the gold tooth which depicts Martin, instead of the little kid in a football uniform. Adios Amigos. John
Originally posted by RickKilgannon
Originally posted by Faust100f
Travon Martin deserved what he got, he should not have been in the area, he was the racist as evidenced by his comment and his killer was NOT a "white cracker" he was hispanic. Zimmerman is innocent, lets see the gang banger pictures and the gold tooth which depicts Martin, instead of the little kid in a football uniform. Adios Amigos. John
He should not have been in the area? TM wasn't allowed to visit his father?
Originally posted by soundguy
reply to post by hounddoghowlie
Are you certain he said that during his call or was it his reenactment? I guess missed that part.
Zimmerman:
We’ve had some break-ins in my neighborhood and there’s a real suspicious guy. It’s Retreat View Circle. The best address I can give you is 111 Retreat View Circle. This guy looks like he’s up to no good or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around looking about. [00:25]
911 dispatcher: OK, is he White, Black, or Hispanic?
Zimmerman: He looks black.
911 dispatcher: Did you see what he was wearing?
Zimmerman: Yeah, a dark hoodie like a gray hoodie. He wore jeans or sweat pants and white tennis shoes. He’s here now … he’s just staring. [00:42]
911 dispatcher: He’s just walking around the area, the houses? OK.
Zimmerman: Now he’s staring at me. [00:48]
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
Originally posted by RickKilgannon
Originally posted by Faust100f
Travon Martin deserved what he got, he should not have been in the area, he was the racist as evidenced by his comment and his killer was NOT a "white cracker" he was hispanic. Zimmerman is innocent, lets see the gang banger pictures and the gold tooth which depicts Martin, instead of the little kid in a football uniform. Adios Amigos. John
He should not have been in the area? TM wasn't allowed to visit his father?
Black people should stick to their inner city ghettos where they belong. I think that's the gist of the poster's argument.
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Originally posted by riffraff
You have the legal right to shoot an attacker (armed or unarmed) if you believe your life is in danger. It doesn't matter if there is one attacker or one hundred. If you slam my head into the pavement, I will shoot you. And after a long drawn out overhyped trial I will walk free. Why do you think we have guns?
No, you need to have a reasonable belief you were in danger. If, for example, you've been having a standing struggle to restrain someone on wet grass, and you slip and fall on your back with the other guy on top of you, then, as he's trying to get back up, you are holding on to his clothing while you get your gun out to shoot him, that's definitely NOT reasonable behaviour.
Originally posted by riffraff
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Originally posted by riffraff
You have the legal right to shoot an attacker (armed or unarmed) if you believe your life is in danger. It doesn't matter if there is one attacker or one hundred. If you slam my head into the pavement, I will shoot you. And after a long drawn out overhyped trial I will walk free. Why do you think we have guns?
No, you need to have a reasonable belief you were in danger. If, for example, you've been having a standing struggle to restrain someone on wet grass, and you slip and fall on your back with the other guy on top of you, then, as he's trying to get back up, you are holding on to his clothing while you get your gun out to shoot him, that's definitely NOT reasonable behaviour.
Is English your first language? Read my quote again. Read it slow. Read it out loud if you still don't get it.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by GrantedBail
She has been exposed as a multiple liar also she said martin was right by his house after he ran and they talked for several minutes before trayvon confronted zimmerman and she DID say Trayvon confronted Zimmerman. That means he was by his house and rather than go in he waited on Zimmerman and confronted him. It's now a fact from the star witness. If you guys still think Zimmerman is guilty then you are too biase. This trial is over. Zimmerman is innocent and this Rachels testimony backs Zimmerman.