It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old responsible for the largest leak in National Security Administration history, appears to have donated to the Ron Paul campaign twice in 2012, according to federal records.
Originally posted by Bassago
reply to post by eLPresidente
Maybe it's going to come down to the Libertarians to fight this fight. Don't have any faith in most of the republicans or democrats to muster enough backbone to take this latest scandal/treason on.
edit on 9-6-2013 by Bassago because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sankari
Hmm, this is a concern. I'm happy to support whistleblowers, but if this guy is a Ron Paul voter that rings alarm bells.
Paul is a radical liberal with some disturbing policies. If this guy is mixed up with him somehow, it's not a good sign. They say he's only a voter but what if it goes deeper than that?
What if he was paid by Paul to steal this information? How do we know the information he's stolen doesn't include people's personal details as well?
Why is Ron Paul paying a government employee to steal confidential information?edit on 9/6/13 by Sankari because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sankari
Paul is a radical liberal with some disturbing policies. If this guy is mixed up with him somehow, it's not a good sign. They say he's only a voter but what if it goes deeper than that?
What if he was paid by Paul to steal this information? How do we know the information he's stolen doesn't include people's personal details as well?
Why is Ron Paul paying a government employee to steal confidential information?edit on 9/6/13 by Sankari because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by Sankari
Hmm, this is a concern. I'm happy to support whistleblowers, but if this guy is a Ron Paul voter that rings alarm bells.
Paul is a radical liberal with some disturbing policies. If this guy is mixed up with him somehow, it's not a good sign. They say he's only a voter but what if it goes deeper than that?
What if he was paid by Paul to steal this information? How do we know the information he's stolen doesn't include people's personal details as well?
Why is Ron Paul paying a government employee to steal confidential information?edit on 9/6/13 by Sankari because: (no reason given)
Whaaaaa??? Ron Paul is no liberal. He wanted restaurants to have the freedom to refuse service to blacks.
Originally posted by Sankari
Hmm, this is a concern. I'm happy to support whistleblowers, but if this guy is a Ron Paul voter that rings alarm bells.
What if he was paid by Paul to steal this information? How do we know the information he's stolen doesn't include people's personal details as well?
Why is Ron Paul paying a government employee to steal confidential information?edit on 9/6/13 by Sankari because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by eLPresidente
He doesn't believe (per the Constitution) the federal government should have the authority to determine how private businesses operated. I don't know why you twisted it to include blacks...are you racist????
edit on 9-6-2013 by eLPresidente because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by muse7
The same Ron Paul that sued his supporters in a U.N court?
Originally posted by Bassago
reply to post by kaylaluv
That includes everyone. No shoes, no shirt, no service is a popular sign in many stores across the US. If I owned a restaurant I would want to say who was allowed in under any circumstance.
This is already getting off topic.edit on 9-6-2013 by Bassago because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Bassago
reply to post by kaylaluv
That includes everyone. No shoes, no shirt, no service is a popular sign in many stores across the US. If I owned a restaurant I would want to say who was allowed in under any circumstance.
This is already getting off topic.edit on 9-6-2013 by Bassago because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by Bassago
reply to post by kaylaluv
That includes everyone. No shoes, no shirt, no service is a popular sign in many stores across the US. If I owned a restaurant I would want to say who was allowed in under any circumstance.
This is already getting off topic.edit on 9-6-2013 by Bassago because: (no reason given)
That also includes blacks right?
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by muse7
The same Ron Paul that sued his supporters in a U.N court?
When did he sue them?
Not saying that he didn't try, just want to know when.
Link
Originally posted by muse7
The same Ron Paul that sued his supporters in a U.N court?
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by Bassago
reply to post by kaylaluv
That includes everyone. No shoes, no shirt, no service is a popular sign in many stores across the US. If I owned a restaurant I would want to say who was allowed in under any circumstance.
This is already getting off topic.edit on 9-6-2013 by Bassago because: (no reason given)
No shoes, no shirt, no service is a little different than no white skin, no service.
To bring it back on topic, the fact that this guy is a Ron Paul supporter is not a plus, IMHO...edit on 9-6-2013 by kaylaluv because: (no reason given)