It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The Australian government has washed its hands of Julian Assange as prosecutors at the trial of US soldier Bradley Manning have openly targeted the WikiLeaks publisher as a conspirator engaged in espionage.
Foreign Minister Bob Carr has told a Senate budget estimates committee that the government would make no more representations to the US on Assange's circumstances because his case “doesn't affect Australian interests”.
Fairfax Media has also learnt that Assange has been prevented by one of the largest banks in the US from making a donation to his own political party.
The Bank of America blocked the transfer to the new WikiLeaks Party of a $25,000 prize awarded to Assange by the Japanese musician, artist and philanthropist Yoko Ono.
Bob Carr may have been Foreign Affairs Minister for only 12 months, but he started talking to United States diplomats about internal Labor politics nearly 40 years ago.
Previously secret US embassy and consulate reports incorporated into a new searchable database unveiled by WikiLeaks on Monday reveal that Mr Carr was a source for US diplomats seeking information on the Whitlam government and the broader Labor movement in the mid-1970s.
The once-confidential cables also suggest that US diplomats turned to Mr Carr as a source of background information on Labor political figures: for example Mr Carr explained that a speaker at a pro-Palestinian demonstration in 1975 – left-wing Labor parliamentarian George Petersen – was "a NSW equivalent of Victoria's [Bill] Hartley".
Senator Carr has long been a very strong supporter of Australia's alliance with the United States and has a keen interest in US politics and history.
Originally posted by XLR8R
reply to post by daaskapital
This is what the world has come to. Be crooked and profit off the backs of other and we will pat you on the back. Be person that does the good for the majority and get prosecuted. We as the human race are in a very sad state right now. Hopefully we can crawl out of this paradigm we have dug ourselves into.
Originally posted by triune
God.... this is so disgusting and humiliating.
Could we possibly demean ourselves anymore than this.
What a pathetic bunch of toe suckers we have become. Australia has become nothing more than another U.S. state.
Originally posted by triune
God.... this is so disgusting and humiliating.
Could we possibly demean ourselves anymore than this.
What a pathetic bunch of toe suckers we have become. Australia has become nothing more than another U.S. state.
Originally posted by daaskapital
This makes me so freaking angry,
Originally posted by TrueBrit
reply to post by Sankari
Well a start would be, not using phrases like "and we cannot do anything about that".
For a start this manner of thinking is unhelpful, and furthermore its utter rubbish.
here are ALWAYS ways and means of doing things, of getting things done.
The very idea that any nation which has both a gross national product and an international foot print (which Australia certainly does) cannot act in certain circumstances to protect and shelter its citizens is false beyond belief.
The fact that they are unwilling to do so because they are at just as much "risk" from him as anyone else however, that is not beyond belief.
They are refusing to help, they are not claiming that it would be impossible to do so.
Originally posted by Sankari
Can I ask exactly what you want the Australian government to do about Assange?
He is currently sheltering in a foreign embassy, and we can't do anything about that.
He is in the foreign embassy to evade an extradition request from Sweden, and we can't do anything about that.
If the Swedes get hold of him it's likely they'll pass him to the USA, and we can't do anything about that.
If he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy he'll be arrested by the British police and handed over to Sweden, and we can't do anything about that.
If by some miraculous feat he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy and reaches the Australian embassy without being arrested by the British police, Sweden will request extradition and we'll be legally required to hand him over; we can't do anything about that.
So I'm curious to know: how do you think the Australian government can help Assange?
when asked by Greens senator Scott Ludlam whether the Australian government would raise the question of Assange's free-speech protection as a journalist under the First Amendment to the US constitution, Senator Carr said that ''it wouldn't be a matter of concern to Australia to make a case for him. No, why would we do that?''
Asked whether the government would inquire whether a US grand jury investigation of Assange was ongoing, Senator Carr said no further inquiries would be made because ''it doesn't affect Australian interests''.