BREAKING VIDEO: UK Terrorists Charging At Police Get Shot

Originally posted by cripmeister

Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by CALGARIAN

 

Just wondering, what kind of sidearms do UK police have? With the amount of shot they got in, I am surprised they are still living. Perhaps it's time to upgrade...............

Glock 7, constructed entirely of porcelain and capable of passing through airport metal detectors completely unnoticed.

Hmmm, do they shoot porcelain bullets?

reply to post by whatzshaken


If you're referring to the tyranny of our governments' foreign policy then I concur with your comment...cos he was definitely making a stand against the UK govt not any others.

However, the eejit was still, whatever he may believe, a British citizen.

reply to post by christina-66


That head shot was due to tactics. The armed Police Officers had been trained to go for head rather than torso if intelligence and assessment indicated the potential use of a suicide vest. The aim would be not to set off the bomb by shooting at the torso and also to render the bomber incapable of detonating it.

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by christina-66


Not just the UK but ALL GOV"T.
There is always a coalition with GOV'T and United Nations and their founding fathers and such

Originally posted by christina-66
I'm really pissed about this whole thing.

Yes our government got involved in illegal wars.
Yes our armed forces are responsible for thousands of innocents deaths.
Yes we have left a deadly chaos in our wake.
Yes those we have in government are criminals.
Yes people hate us now - when they'd never even heard of us before.


But..these clowns were British citizens...and no matter how much we like to play at mental masturbation on ATS...Britain is still a democracy....and they could have played their part in changing it from the inside if they were so politically motivated. It was their government.

This eejit talked of 'our women' seeing machete deaths all the time? Who the hell was he referring to? The women of Woolwich? Cos I don't think they do see it all the time.

edit on 24-5-2013 by christina-66 because: (no reason given)

Islam was thrust upon the people of the Middle East and beyond through violence. They are not interested in democracy, that's why it is futile trying to thrust this ideology onto them in the M.E and beyond.

Unfortunately it's the radicalised Muslims that control Islam currently, just like it was the minority of Nazis that took control of Germany. Look at how Muslims are marching through Africa and converting vast swathes of that continent to Islam. Christians are being murdered and Sharia law being imposed in these lands. All whilst the quiet majority of Muslims say and do nothing.

Sure we heard some outrage within the Muslim community, but as soon as these radicalised Muslims get a hold, they will soon be changing their tune. After all there is only one true prophet according to the Koran, the infidels will reap what they sow.

reply to post by tommyjo


Ach that doesn't explain seven bullets at point blank range - the guy was suspended and investigated cos it was in breach of his training.

reply to post by whatzshaken


He was talking to the ppl of the UK - but I hope you noticed where I placed my apostrophe when I wrote 'governments'.

reply to post by Cobaltic1978

Islam was thrust upon the people of the Middle East and beyond through violence. They are not interested in democracy, that's why it is futile trying to thrust this ideology onto them in the M.E and beyond.

with that logic, so was Christianity but on the west.

Is that why there is a separation of church and state?

So they can fight a religious war being a separate entity itself? ie. the GOV"T

reply to post by Cobaltic1978

Islam was thrust upon the people of the Middle East and beyond through violence. They are not interested in democracy, that's why it is futile trying to thrust this ideology onto them in the M.E and beyond.

Get this - he was British - and raised in a Christian household...he was NOT middle eastern.

I agree - radical Islam does have a grip - and we, in the UK have some responsibility for that (at least in our own country).

Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by whatzshaken

 

He was talking to the ppl of the UK - but I hope you noticed where I placed my apostrophe when I wrote 'governments'.

GOVT is not distinct to the UK and GOVT international rules follow United Nation resolutions

reply to post by whatzshaken


I wrote "governments' " - that's plural