It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jhill76
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by jhill76
There is only one God.
Why is there only one god?
There is one God, but there are others (very small number) that sit outside of creation with him, and assist so to speak. That question can not be answered in one sentence. Because, others understand things differently, and the answer will be different dependent upon whom you ask.
I am having a hard time translating this into human terms. Maybe akushla99 can chime in here.
I will need to see this in perspective to give a proper answer, I will return and give answer.edit on 23-5-2013 by jhill76 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
I agree with you. God is everything that is. But if god's emergence, the universe, can happen once, can't there be many universes, simultaneously, that are also autonomous gods?
if you are creating something from yourself alone....
the only way to create an equal is to divide in half.......
Consider the process of childbirth...
Is your child lesser than you?
But doesn't the cause somehow turn into the effect? Without the effect, there would be no cause and vice versa.
Think of it like a scale, where the cause is one end and the effect the other. They may be opposites, but they are still part of the scale. God (scale) is both the creator (cause) and the creation (effect).
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by akushla99
Consider the process of childbirth...
Is your child lesser than you?
This, in the mind of standard Christians, is an irrelevant question because the product of dirt is still dirt.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Can God create something that is greater than itself? Or, is it true that God can only create something that is lesser than itself?
Originally posted by solve
reply to post by windword
if you are creating something from yourself alone....
the only way to create an equal is to divide in half.......
to create all sorts of life...... god is disintegrated....
like in many myths.....
self sacrifice is the ultimate gift.... just like godsus taught us....edit on 24-5-2013 by solve because: godsus
enochwasright
There cannot be a finite number of eternal things, therefore, the eternal cannot change. Finite things change, but there cannot be an infinite number of finite things. Like you say, the beginning and the end is what changes. It comes from the Eternal. What is moved must be anchored by what does not. I agree. This is the purpose of the image and the only way fellowship can happen. I think my link hit this very topic.
akushla99
Finite issuing from infinite...cannot be infinite? Is this what you are saying? Procedurally, this does not gel...
*Thinks*...Infinite produces finite (infinitely), but Enoch says this does not happen...is there limited...mmm...conceptual space for this production of 'finite' things?...or indeed, limited physical space? Å99
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by akushla99
enochwasright
There cannot be a finite number of eternal things, therefore, the eternal cannot change. Finite things change, but there cannot be an infinite number of finite things. Like you say, the beginning and the end is what changes. It comes from the Eternal. What is moved must be anchored by what does not. I agree. This is the purpose of the image and the only way fellowship can happen. I think my link hit this very topic.
akushla99
Finite issuing from infinite...cannot be infinite? Is this what you are saying? Procedurally, this does not gel...
*Thinks*...Infinite produces finite (infinitely), but Enoch says this does not happen...is there limited...mmm...conceptual space for this production of 'finite' things?...or indeed, limited physical space? Å99
Conceptual space is unlimited, as ideaform creates its own space/birth local and becomes perceptual. Think of soap bubbles (any variety and can visualize how this happens).edit on 24-5-2013 by vethumanbeing because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by windword
I believe God does duplicate himself, by us having babies. The only true miracle is that of life, and that miracle is performed many many times everyday by women giving birth. There is no such thing as "lesser" or "greater" in God's kingdom (the universe), we are all equal and all One.
That's my take on it at least. I know lots of people will disagree though.edit on 23-5-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
windword
God hasn't duplicated itself by creating the universe, but does do so through the procreation of human mammals? How about all the other flora and fauna? If there is no thing that is greater or lesser than god, are all created things equal to god?
Originally posted by vethumanbeing
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by akushla99
enochwasright
There cannot be a finite number of eternal things, therefore, the eternal cannot change. Finite things change, but there cannot be an infinite number of finite things. Like you say, the beginning and the end is what changes. It comes from the Eternal. What is moved must be anchored by what does not. I agree. This is the purpose of the image and the only way fellowship can happen. I think my link hit this very topic.
akushla99
Finite issuing from infinite...cannot be infinite? Is this what you are saying? Procedurally, this does not gel...
*Thinks*...Infinite produces finite (infinitely), but Enoch says this does not happen...is there limited...mmm...conceptual space for this production of 'finite' things?...or indeed, limited physical space? Å99
Conceptual space is unlimited, as ideaform creates its own space/birth local and becomes perceptual. Think of soap bubbles (any variety and can visualize how this happens).
akushla99
VHB...(you will appreciate this)...
There is a bridge in language that cannot be built with words that describe solidity - up to and including, just short of gaseous concepts......and enquirers are insisting on following this matrix, as if it would/could or should describe processes that fall waaay outside the range of even the most gaseous concepts...
I'm seeing in this thread (quite apart from the stellar OP) some pertinent enquiry...It's heart warming...Å99