The One Man who can End Barack Obama’s Presidency Tomorrow

reply to post by FlyersFan

The question mark on the end doesn't make it a question.

This is a new conspiracy theory I haven't heard of yet, please continue as I am




I thought that in the English language when a sentence is written and finishes of with a question mark it makes it question, You know because of the ?

Our politicians might get caught but they don't get held accountable.
They might not be above the law but they create the laws.

reply to post by FlyersFan

Originally posted by FlyersFan
If you watch the video at the news link, the ALLEGATIONS by the families are there.

I can't watch the video, but I have read some about the family's allegations. But how do they know what happened any more than I do? Besides, if my son had been killed in a senseless accident, I might get a little crazy with the allegations, too.

And ABC news, who did the interview, says that it is the team that took out UBL.

It IS the same team. Seal Team 6. But there are 200 of them. It was not the same members who killed Bin Laden.

Someone gave the orders to withdraw support for the team.

I didn't see the video. Is that a fact or assumption?

The possible conspiracy ... shadow gov't/NWO (which you've said you don't believe in)
getting rid of those who took place in the UBL raid because the UBL-death story
is wrong and/or fabricated. Or getting rid of them for another reason.

This theory doesn't flush because it wasn't the same people who killed Bin Laden.

OR the other possible conspiracy ... someone in the military screwed up and didn't
give our Seals/Special Ops teams adequate cover like they usually get ... and then
they failed to investigate .. (or covered it up)

That's certainly a possibility. I don't know how likely it is, however. Cover-ups of that magnitude would have to shut up a lot of people...

Originally posted by FlyersFan

Originally posted by redtic
But you *want* it to be true, now don't you??

That was a statement. The question mark on the end doesn't make it a question.
The intent was clear.

Don't tell me what my intent was. You have no clue.

(see how that works..)

(mods - apologies for the highschool-ish interchange..)

Originally posted by muse7Lol

By adding "-gate" to everything, it really shows how desperate you people really are. Here's a little factoid for you.When helicopters suffer a mechanical malfunction while in flight, they tend to come down and crash and depending on the altitude and speed that the helicopter was going the occupants might not survive.

But I know that you get off on the impeachment porn that right wing blogs keep feeding you.

With respect to the present administration impeachment would be "soft porn" - I'll leave it to the imagination as to what might constitute "hard porn" - as a hint think wall - then think many corrupt politicians lined up against that wall blindfolded - this follows the Tribunals that have made their just hard core political porn pronouncements.

Maybe he hasn't come forward because there is actually no truth to these stories - heck he's probably never even heard of them - the stories that is.

reply to post by FlyersFan


Obama-gate. The man is a walking conspiracy theory. Funny how he said he'd have the most transparent administration and what we finally have is secrets and lies and obfuscation and blame.

Oh what interesting times we live in!

reply to post by FlyersFan

"Duty, Honor, Country" David not Fear, Shame, Globalists....do the right thing (right for the country and your legacy).

You guys keep forgetting Monsanto-Fence!

reply to post by FlyersFan


I think you forgot Wiener Gate.

reply to post by FlyersFan


Petraeus scandal was timed perfectly, no doubt about it.

Now, with all of the scandals breaking open even the press is turning on
Obama. The Petraeus affair was known way before it was blown open,
although it seems they left him in place and used him to help
smooth over the initial Benghazi wave...

The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault.

It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack.
..........

What Petraeus decided to do with that request is the pivotal moment in the controversy over the administration’s Benghazi talking points. It was from his initial input that all else flowed, resulting in 48 hours of intensive editing that congressional Republicans cite as evidence of a White House coverup.
www.washingtonpost.com... 7813_story.html

So, yes Petraeus is sure to have some real knowledge of what went down in Benghazi,
and also the bin Laden raid. Will he talk....? I dont know, wish someone would.

Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by MrSpad

 

1 - I am a veteran of the US miltiary (Army). I do indeed understand that errors happen on the battlefield .. that there are investigations ... that some of the investigations result in cover ups.

2 - I stated very clearly that I am not believing or disbelieving the article. It's only here for discussion.

3 - I also stated very clearly that I dont think the Seal Team 6 controversy would go all the way to Obama. I've said that he is not exactly a 'hands on' kind of guy with the military.

4 - If you had read the thread, you would have known all that.

I read the title. Then I tried to read the idiocy that followed in the thread. If you were in the military then you know the entire things is complete BS so why bother to post it.

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
heck he's probably never even heard of them - the stories that is.

Did you join the Whitehouse staffers?
Funny, this is the line they use everyday....

They all are certain, and innocent in that they know nothing about everything,
and they are sure they have had nothing to do with any of it.


www.youtube.com...

reply to post by burntheships


And y'all are so damned sure that in fact they are plotting it all quiet deliberately in league with each other......and yet they are also not quiet clever enough to do so properly - ie to make it actually secret, or actually work properly....

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul


Well, it would be funny if it were not so damned serious, either they are all lying,
or they are grossly incompetent, and need to be fired, impeached all of them.

The comments in this thread attacking the OP are so obvious,
you would think this is the WhiteHouse press room.

This is a better source of info from the family of one of the seals who died. It is full of info they have collected from other military and apparently a hearing on the matter.

fox news vid
The interview begins at 2:30


Some things that stood out (paraphrasing)
1. 7 afgans were removed from the flight at the last minute and replaced with others without time to change the manifest.

2. The plane was not designed for what the assignment and had not been used for such before.

3. Their son called within 24 hrs of the team being identified by Biden and told his mother to wipe info off her computer. There was chatter and the guys were scared.

They speak with some understanding of the subject...after all they are a military family and have contacts.

sandf OP
I think though, we are looking at henchmen...and escape goats
as to the puppet masters, they are on the other side of the scandals we see

So, I think that when its all said and done when the smoke clears
there will be a small handfull of people with pretty much all the loot
that will tell the tale of this episode
the next episode, a short one, will be the likely be a game of last man standing

then back to sticks and stones

Originally posted by MrSpad

Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by MrSpad

 

1 - I am a veteran of the US miltiary (Army). I do indeed understand that errors happen on the battlefield .. that there are investigations ... that some of the investigations result in cover ups.

2 - I stated very clearly that I am not believing or disbelieving the article. It's only here for discussion.

3 - I also stated very clearly that I dont think the Seal Team 6 controversy would go all the way to Obama. I've said that he is not exactly a 'hands on' kind of guy with the military.

4 - If you had read the thread, you would have known all that.

I read the title. Then I tried to read the idiocy that followed in the thread. If you were in the military then you know the entire things is complete BS so why bother to post it.

Hey glad to hear from you,

Because as was clearly stated in his/her four points and you did not understand or comprehend the article, as you stated the article was "idiocy" or Im sorry the subsequential posts were "idiocy." Try reading the information provided

Here's a fun angle to ponder...even if it wasn't the same exact people who where involved in the OBL raid. What if it was one of those stingers "we didn't provide" to forces related to Al CIAduh that took down that chopper. As soon as it was determined they shut down investigations and tried to cover up any traces of their involvement knowing the scandal it would bring.

reply to post by FlyersFan


The question is, why is Petraeus still alive? If he is such a terribly potent loose end, surely he would have been eliminated by now?