It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stars15k
reply to post by smurfy
OH, dear God. Watch the video I messed up the link to.
The reasons I have the sentence "I don't know what a 'chemtrails' is" is because it is a quote from the man himself, mere minutes into the video.
Geo-engineering is not about visible plumes behind aircraft now. He also explains this in the OP video. What he is talking about, the real geo-engineering of stratospheric aerosol spraying would not be visible, would be higher than what you consider a"chemtrail" and is not being done now. He is a researcher, as are all his colleagues. They examine the matter from all angles, then decide if it is something that can done, then talk about if it should be done. All before anyone does anything. He discusses this as well.
The people who decided to wear a mask of legitimacy by changing their boogeyman from "chemtrails" to geo-engineering are wrong. The field is so much more than that. Those who further try to legitimize themselves by using the phrase "stratospheric aerosol spraying" need to learn a lot more about the atmosphere.
When you call "chemtrails", point to the sky at a contrail, and then say it's "stratospheric aerosol spraying," you are WRONG. Re-editing someone's statement with made-up words that are wrong...he doesn't like that happening to him either. He discusses this when asked about "WITWATS."
So your post and your video...are wrong in just about every way. Watch the video. It's 1:45, but enlightening.edit on 19-5-2013 by stars15k because: clarity
Originally posted by smurfy
What fantasy is that?
you're making no sense for this thread.
What do you know about David Keith?
What do you know about the ideology of actually deliberately warming the planet, or part of it.
and most of all, you know feck all about me, or what I think. A word of advice, so's you don't need to use your label sticker, click on Smurfy and you will get all my posts, or a portion on them. there is nothing so cut and dried as you might wish.
Originally posted by FriedBabelBroccoli
LoL the irony of a "geoengineer" claiming he doesn't know what "chemtrails" are in a video where he debunks them.
David Keith doesn't know what Chemtrails are?? who's being misleading there!
LoL the irony of a "geoengineer" claiming he doesn't know what "chemtrails" are in a video where he debunks them.
Originally posted by stars15k
reply to post by smurfy
Of course he does.....he just doesn't believe in them.
And doesn't like that people twist his words, edit with spin, and apply things to his work that is not happening. For example, "chemtrails."
Watch the video. He knows what he is talking about. The other people, not so much. And it is evident.
Geo-engineering is not "chemtrails."
"Chemtrails" is not geo-engineering.
Stratospheric Aerosols are not "chemtrails."
"Chemtrails" are not stratospheric aerosols.
"Chemtrails" have no evidence of worth. It has believers, who don't know or understand the science behind what they are claiming.
David Keith knows this. He doesn't believe in them. He knows they won't work. He knows what he is talking about.
You....not so much.
This is directed at you and the video you posted: You add words to what he says for deceptive reasons. What you are presenting is wrong, in it's editing, in it's captioning, and in using statements by someone who would disavow what the video says. What is done is dishonest.
That is the makings of a hoax.
Even if you dont believe there is anything in the con-trails you can not dispute that the shear amount of fuel and pollution from more and more planes is causing global dimming by FORMING CLOUD FRONTS THAT TURN INTO WEATHER FORMATIONS
Ironically, the relationship between changes in the weather and contrail formation is opposite to the allegations that contrails are formed to influence the weather. Actually, weather conditions favorable for contrail formation are exactly the same as those preceding a storm front, and are the same conditions that cause natural clouds to form. Weather conditions do cause contrails, but contrails do not cause weather.
This is the sky above me on a clear blue day (WOULD HAVE BEEN) that was turned into overcast with artificial clouds affecting our weather.
Originally posted by FriedBabelBroccoli
LoL the irony of a "geoengineer" claiming he doesn't know what "chemtrails" are in a video where he debunks them.
Honestly the guy comes across as a huge asshole.
Also OP you loose a massive amount of credibility in not being able to figure out how to post a video when it involves click a button labeled vid:youtube then copy and pasting 20 characters of text.
I have no comment on the validity of any of it.
Originally posted by smurfy
Then why does Keith talk about administering aluminium particles in the stratosphere by the use of aircraft? or are you going to say Keith has not mentioned that? That's all that matters here now, so has he said that or not?
Yes or No....I'll answer for him and you the answer is a resounding Yes.
Originally posted by stars15k
reply to post by smurfy
He is discussing stratospheric aerosol spraying.
If you watched the video (this shows you haven't) , you would see him explain that planes leaving contrails are not flying in the stratosphere, that such spraying as he describes would not create a plume, and that no one is doing it now anyway.
If you call that a "chemtrail", you are wrong.
He does not call that, or anything else a "chemtrail." Especially anything in the sky now.
Really, all your questions about what he says, the vocabulary he uses, his assertions regarding "chemtrails" and other conspiracies would be answered if you watch the video.
I suggest you do so.
Otherwise your input is off topic.