It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The men were spotted near Worbarrow Bay "nonchalantly" walking awawy from the beach holding the 120-millimetre tank shells. A shocked woman, who has not been named, took a photograph of the men with her mobile phone, saying: “I thought they were carrying rugs, but as they walked past, I saw they were enormous shells" she said.
The shells were found on the 7,000-acre Lulworth Military Range used by the Army for tank firing practice.
It is not yet certain whether they are live bombs, but it is thought the two men took them hoping to sell them for scrap metal.
A spokesman for the MoD said the shells would have probably been fired from a Chieftain tank or a Wombat anti-tank rifle used by the Army during the Cold War.
Originally posted by Slugworth
Is it even possible that the shells are still dangerous after sitting in a field exposed to the elements for the last 60+ years? I'm not saying I would pick them up, especially given that there are signs posted that prohibit such a thing. I just wonder if they should be considered "unexploded bombs" if the explosive content has deteriorated and become inert. How long does that stuff stay dangerous?
Originally posted by Slugworth
Thank you Zaphod58 and Krakatoa for clarifying that. It is surprising information. It probably would have been a big surprise to the guys in the article too if they blew up, because they probably made the same assumption that I did. However, if I had found those things I still wouldn't have touched them because assumptions are dangerous when handling weapons.