It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by DoubleDNH
... but why does everyone not want to shop locally and help the people in your community... you should be doing this already if you ask me. Instead, you send your money off to parts unknown to god knows who and feed into big business.
Because the last time I've been able to find anything I was looking for in a brick and mortar store other than groceries was never.
Unless I want to ignore the fact that the thing I really want is online somewhere and just buy the thing that closests resembles what I want because it's the only thing available.
Originally posted by DoubleDNH
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Ahhh.... I've come to learn that when a bill has "Fairness" in the name? The only thing it's going to be "Fair" to is the Government itself. We never see the nice end of that fair concept. Just the big blunt end where the sun don't shine.
I now have absolutely no reason to shop online when the same product exists in a real store, anywhere within driving distance. The only benefit left was a bit of savings. Now? The offset falls in favor of a real counter and human being to go raise hell with when it breaks or never works in the first place. Nice forward thinking there, Congress. Oh yeah.... regular brainiacs up there.
I don't understand why people have an issue with this bill. It protects the mom n pop stores and local retailers. I understand you will have to pay an extra couple percent on your bill but why does everyone not want to shop locally and help the people in your community... you should be doing this already if you ask me. Instead, you send your money off to parts unknown to god knows who and feed into big business.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by DoubleDNH
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Ahhh.... I've come to learn that when a bill has "Fairness" in the name? The only thing it's going to be "Fair" to is the Government itself. We never see the nice end of that fair concept. Just the big blunt end where the sun don't shine.
I now have absolutely no reason to shop online when the same product exists in a real store, anywhere within driving distance. The only benefit left was a bit of savings. Now? The offset falls in favor of a real counter and human being to go raise hell with when it breaks or never works in the first place. Nice forward thinking there, Congress. Oh yeah.... regular brainiacs up there.
I don't understand why people have an issue with this bill. It protects the mom n pop stores and local retailers. I understand you will have to pay an extra couple percent on your bill but why does everyone not want to shop locally and help the people in your community... you should be doing this already if you ask me. Instead, you send your money off to parts unknown to god knows who and feed into big business.
...and what of my business, as I may one day want to set up online? Am I not worthy of maintaining the benefits which have made that worthwhile up to this point? As a consumer, should I be losing the small benefit that made the other downsides and inherent risks of shopping online with products and business unseen, worth it?
In the endless, endless grab for more money? It just never EVER stops. It's tax, more tax, and OH! Did they miss a tiny loophole somewhere? A spot which hasn't been taxed half to death? A fishing hole with a dollar still swimming around, unmolested? Well, they MUST fix that oversight!
Application of taxes toward the Internet has been avoided and for good reason. The lack of them and paperwork associated with collecting and staying in compliance with them has encouraged risk by normal people like you and me to either start business or buy from it ...in a setting that isn't so easy to make the sale in on trust alone, before touching the myriad other issues. That's been a GOOD basis ....and in a down economy?? Why is it the ONLY side that is absolutely DEMANDING their "Fair Share" ends not with a .com but with a .gov??
Originally posted by SinMaker
I'll be interested to see in the next year or so how different business is going to be. Will we see a return of our malls and plaza's or will the big shippers further cut their prices to the bone?
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by rickymouse
I disagree. I have a small business, but it is dependent on internet sales.
This is just another way for the Govt to steal from the people.
Originally posted by rickymouse
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by rickymouse
I disagree. I have a small business, but it is dependent on internet sales.
This is just another way for the Govt to steal from the people.
It is a tax. The government will get the money it needs to run someway. I would rather see it as an open tax than a pile of hidden taxes and fines for things that shouldn't be illegal in the first place.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
reply to post by eLPresidente
Washington doesn't have an income tax?
Shows how mcuh I know about taxes.
But anyway, I know that Washington has a sales tax applied to people who live there.
That map should include states with no income tax and no sales tax, right? Because aren't you arguing that a sales tax and/or income tax is bad and just helps to pay for a big budget.
So Washingtion has a sales sax but has a budget surplus.edit on 8-5-2013 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)
you gotta love the dooble speak
its about being "fair"
you pay more! you pay more!