It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


"Freedom From War" Circa 1961

page: 1

log in


posted on Apr, 29 2013 @ 02:19 PM
I found this after watching a you tube video on a FB post about gun control.
Freedom From War UN Document

They mention nuclear and chemical armaments throughout the document, as to imply that it is only WMD that they are trying to eliminate, yet mention "all armaments" several times.

This looks very much like a pre-PNAC NWO blueprint to me. It looks like a pre-cursor to invading Iraq and Iran, and possibly N. Korea.

They do not directly mention the use of false flag operations, however 911 fits the bill for paving the way to stage 1, especially if it is false flag.

The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission (Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton) said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”.

The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission also said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn’t bother to tell the American people.

Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only “the first draft” of history.

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”.

9/11 Commissioner John Lehman said that “We purposely put together a staff that had - in a way - conflicts of interest“.

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry, said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”

MIHOP, LIHOP, or blatant mishandling of the entire situation (911)? Those are the 3 possible scenarios for how it happened, but I think this document illustrates that no matter how or why or when it happened, it would be used to further the agenda outlined within.


log in