It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A man who had covered himself in petrol became a human fireball after police shot him with a Taser...
...A police watchdog will investigate whether firing the weapon at Andrew Pimlott, 32, caused fatal burns...
...He was taken to hospital... where he died five days later...
"...Our investigation will be looking at what information was known to the officers attending the scene, [and] the officer's rationale for discharging a Taser on a person known to be doused in flammable liquid..."
Originally posted by pause4thought
Yet another death following use of this 'non-lethal weapon' by the police.
Originally posted by pause4thought
reply to post by trollz & benrl
Folks, the cops KNEW he was covered in flammable liquid.
Criminal negligence at its worst.
Originally posted by pause4thought
reply to post by benrl
True. But your premise that this abrogates the police of responsibility for this man's death is bunkum.
You call the police to defuse a situation. Not to set a match to light a member of the public — whom they are paid to protect.
Originally posted by trollz
Originally posted by pause4thought
Yet another death following use of this 'non-lethal weapon' by the police.
The guy covered himself in gasoline and died from the resulting burns, not from being shocked to death.
This is not a fair way to criticize the use of these weapons.
Originally posted by pause4thought
Folks, the cops KNEW he was covered in flammable liquid.
Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
reply to post by benrl
And if the cops KNOWS its a toy gun, but decides to shoot anyway, the cop is STILL guilty of negligence, or more realistically, murder.
Originally posted by trollz
Originally posted by pause4thought
Yet another death following use of this 'non-lethal weapon' by the police.
The guy covered himself in gasoline and died from the resulting burns, not from being shocked to death.
This is not a fair way to criticize the use of these weapons.
Originally posted by Knives4eyes
What if it was intentional death by cop situation? What is the police officer supposed to do, you can't expect the LE to put his life on the line also.
But this is only if it was an intentional death by cop scenario.
Originally posted by Timely
reply to post by justwokeup
Have got to disagree on your take on this.
Would you suggest a close quarters approach ? With flammable liquids - obvious - but quantity or
placement - yet unascertained ? No batons there.
A carefully directed ( not in the manual ) pistol shot to dis-able and not cause combustion ?
What would be your non-lethal yet - Extremely immediate - response be, considering your options
and responsibilities ?