It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by YapTalk
Wow Defcon!
My right to freedom exceeds EVERYONE'S Rights!
So do yours, your mom's, your children's, every single member of ATS etc!
Sorry I had someone at the door.
Anyway, one persons rights conflicting with another's is the BASIS of law, specifically criminal law.
Your right to be noisy vs my rights to quite = Disturbing the peace...
Your right to go where you want vs my right to not allow you on my property = Trespassing...
Your right to carry a gun vs my right not to be threatened by it = Brandishing...
Your right to touch me vs my right to not be touched by you = Battery...
Your right to make a threatening remark vs my right not to be threatened = Assault...
Shall I keep on going?
Police have the right to suspend another citizens rights based on certain criteria.
That is what a terry stop, detainment, and arrest are.
Originally posted by enjoies05
reply to post by ColoradoJens
Nah. Having cars, people, trains traveling all around whilst a terrorist who just attacked the city is on the loose is completely smart.
They should have told everyone to go grab their kids and join in on the search. That would have been better.
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by ColoradoJens
You have no right to do these things because they invade the rights of other people...
You also don't have the right to do whatever you want during a police emergency if you are putting other folks in harms way by doing so.
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by YapTalk
Wow Defcon!
My right to freedom exceeds EVERYONE'S Rights!
So do yours, your mom's, your children's, every single member of ATS etc!
Sorry I had someone at the door.
Anyway, one persons rights conflicting with another's is the BASIS of law, specifically criminal law.
Your right to be noisy vs my rights to quite = Disturbing the peace...
Your right to go where you want vs my right to not allow you on my property = Trespassing...
Your right to carry a gun vs my right not to be threatened by it = Brandishing...
Your right to touch me vs my right to not be touched by you = Battery...
Your right to make a threatening remark vs my right not to be threatened = Assault...
Shall I keep on going?
Police have the right to suspend another citizens rights based on certain criteria.
That is what a terry stop, detainment, and arrest are.
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by ColoradoJens
You have no right to do these things because they invade the rights of other people...
You also don't have the right to do whatever you want during a police emergency if you are putting other folks in harms way by doing so.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
Actually you have no right to these things because they are not "rights". I don't believe anywhere in the constitution does it mention any of these things being your "right". You CAN do these actions, but they can cause you to be arrested, as you point out. You have very defined "rights" and none of these are them.
CJ
Originally posted by LiquesenceSimply walking down the street minding one's own business does not infringe on anyone's rights.
Originally posted by Liquesence
I have the right to go to my house—my private property—even though I can understand it might be a safety issue
Originally posted by Liquesence
Furthermore, while one is on one's own private property, unless that property is directly part of an active crime scene, one has the right to stand outside in one's yard, one does not have to "remain inside," and the cops can't just come searching door to door (especially inside) without a warrant.
Originally posted by Liquesence
How does my freedom to travel or go out put anyone else in harm's way or invade others' rights??
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
Actually you have no right to these things because they are not "rights". I don't believe anywhere in the constitution does it mention any of these things being your "right". You CAN do these actions, but they can cause you to be arrested, as you point out. You have very defined "rights" and none of these are them.
CJ
So you're saying you don't have the right to protest?
You don't have the right to have a party?
You don't have the right to play a radio outside?
You don't have the right to carry a firearm?
Yet when you do those things to a level where they invade on your neighbors right to peace and security, they become crimes.
Go ahead exercise your so called right to do as you please... to walk where you want and to make yourself as big of an idiot of yourself, in an environment with gunshots, bombs, and stressed out people, police and otherwise.
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by ColoradoJens
Your just not grasping the basic concept here, and I cannot think of a simpler way to put it.
Criminal law is based on limiting your rights when they overstep the rights of other citizens...
So, for example...
You don't have the right to kill, because other people have a right to live.
You don't have a right to steal because others have a right to ownership.
You don't have a right to put others in danger, because others have a right to safety.
You don't have a right to be obscene, because other have a right not to be sujected to it.
Etc...
Sorry, I just cannot find a simpler way to express it.
Originally posted by rudeboyrave
There was a drill on the same day and during the same time as 9/11 not far from New York requiring all the fighter jets to be off somewhere else, not defending the nation.
Originally posted by LuckyLucian
reply to post by ColoradoJens
I don't see how the OKC bombing is even relevant. Boston wasn't put on lockdown on the day of the marathon bombing, neither was OKC on that day, either.
Had the suspect(s) shot a cop at, say, Brown Mackie College and then went on a maniacal shooting/bombing spree while being chased by cops all the way down to Norman, then going into hiding... maybe it'd be relevant. But none of that happened. Instead, McVeigh was pulled over for speeding or some such a week and a half later. Apples and oranges.
Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by Moshpet
Go ahead exercise your so called right to do as you please... to walk where you want and to make yourself as big of an idiot of yourself, in an environment with gunshots, bombs, and stressed out people, police and otherwise.
Sure. Except that is Boston on a good night. People seem to exercise that right nightly. Funny that it was a civilian breaking the curfew who was having a smoke outside who found the perp. Who would have thought? Perhaps if people were allowed to live their lives this guys would have been caught sooner. So called rights indeed.
CJ