It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gazrok
reply to post by Zaphod58
Yep, there are 3 options (cruise missiles) if I recall correctly, a single cylinder, a double, or a rack of 4 missile cylinders. I have to find a link to the article, but as I recall, when they bought them, they did so without any cylinders or firing mechanisms for them. Just torpedoes and mines. But, I wouldn't put it past them to modify them.
This is for the Whiskey, mind you. The Romeo and other subs they have, have no such capability.edit on 5-4-2013 by Gazrok because: (no reason given)
How about a delivery system that would not include a rocket or missile?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by butcherguy
Good luck getting one of those old subs across the Pacific without being detected though. The US might not have the best record at tracking diesel submarines, but the Whiskey and Romeo are based on late/immediately post WWII designs. That means they're noisy as hell, and have to spend a lot of time on or near the surface snorkeling. That means a lot of noise that can be picked up a long way away.
Both sides have backed off a lot over that whole situation. There were talks scheduled,
Originally posted by lcbjr1979
Sounds like our troops are getting ready for a fight in the Pacific, and or a preemptive strike.