It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not only does spring herald warmer days and blooming flowers, it also kicks off fireball season—a time of year when bright meteors appear in greater number than usual. Oftentimes fragments of asteroids and comets, meteors typically range in size from a few feet to smaller than a grain of sand. As these objects enter Earth’s atmosphere, they break apart in fiery displays that last only seconds. In the weeks around the start of spring, the appearance rate of bright meteors, aka fireballs, can increase by as much as 30 percent. The reason why is still unknown, but one hypothesis is that more space debris litters this section of Earth’s orbit. In search of the answer, NASA scientists set up a network of ground cameras that track and record video of meteors flaming overhead. The footage can be used to pinpoint a meteor's orbit and origin.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
I don't think I ever heard the term "fireball season" until last year. Even though NASA "says" this time of year has always been called "fireball season", I certainly don't remember it ever being called that before, and I asked a friend and a relative of mine who are both amateur astronomers, and they said they had only heard of the term recently, I think it is just one more reason why people say NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer.
A 'fireball' is a brighter-than-usual meteor. The International Astronomical Union defines a fireball as "a meteor brighter than any of the planets" (magnitude −4 or greater).[21] The International Meteor Organization (an amateur organization that studies meteors) has a more rigid definition. It defines a fireball as a meteor that would have a magnitude of −3 or brighter if seen at zenith.
Fireballs reaching magnitude −14 or brighter are called bolides.[25] The IAU has no official definition of "bolide", and generally considers the term synonymous with "fireball". Astronomers often use "bolide" to identify an exceptionally bright fireball, particularly one that explodes (sometimes called a detonating fireball).
Using Mike Hankey's fireball data: Just events with over 50 observations the biggest months are Feb (by far), March, Jan...then Nov/Dec tie.
The months with the most number of fireballs is: Nov, Dec, Jan, then Oct.
The months with the biggest average observers (size/number) is Mar (not even counting the NY event), Feb, April So in general the months of Feb/Mar have the largest fireballs, and Nov/Dec have the most fireballs.
As the ecliptic is higher in the sky in the Northern hemisphere in winter during nighttime, you can expect more ecliptic fireballs in winter generally: say October to March.
The second part of that period is when the ecliptic is highest in the sky in the evening - good for slow grazing fireballs (objects that are "overtaken" by earth) that attract attention.
The latter effect is why spring/early summer has a slightly elevated number of meteorite falls, favouring the afternoon and early evening.
I have never seen convincing quantified data showing the existence of true fireball streams in spring.
Originally posted by maythetruthbeknown
I have never heard the term fireball season before so did a little research. I found a video on youtube (really reliable, I know ) However am halfway through it and although long and quite boring it does bring up several verifiable facts.
Did Nasa Just coin the term Fireball season out of nowhere??
Well here is the vid
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Why attack NASA? Why not instead do a little bit of research?
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Why attack NASA? Why not instead do a little bit of research?
Why attack NASA? Well, how about the fact that they regularly lie to the people who pay their salaries. Evidence of which is all over this site and the rest of the internet.
edit on 5-4-2013 by PlanetXisHERE because: addition
Originally posted by eriktheawful
I would have thought Nibiru taught you that from last year, when you tried to make things fit for it to show up by August last year. You were absolutely sure it would show up, and claimed that all the evidence was there for it to.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by eriktheawful
I would have thought Nibiru taught you that from last year, when you tried to make things fit for it to show up by August last year. You were absolutely sure it would show up, and claimed that all the evidence was there for it to.
I said the EARLIEST it could be possibly seen by the naked eye would be August, and never bought into the Dec 2012 mania, though I know through EVIDENCE that our planet is undergoing rapid changes not seen in our times or not seen in our recorded history, and will not live in denial as many.
Normalcy bias is a proven and widespread condition.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by eriktheawful
So you are saying there are changes our earth has undergone before that us humans may not be aware of, or only a select few may be aware of, changes that could up-end our delicate technological society?
I would have to agree with you on that one.