It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Blaming things on others only made me look bad. (And weak)
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I've seen it stated somewhere where the president wants all the power, yet none of the responsibility.
I'm not sure what personality type that defines that type of behavior, nor do I really care at this point.
Originally posted by solomons path
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
No, No, No . . . It was the Republicans idea to cut . . . the WH just came up with the way to do it.
It's important to remember (stated three times) that it was the Republicans that wanted the cuts . . . but, look it's not a win for the Republicans 'cuz they wanted funding for border and defense. Look the WH just came up with the way to do . . . so the President was right in the debate . . . but, but, but . . /sarcasm
I wonder if this press secretary will last through the summer . . . he reminds me of the character Martin Short used to play on Saturday Night Live . . . "I'm not the one lying, you're the liar . . . sweating? I'm not sweating. You're sweating . . . would you like me to get you some water? Well, do you have any for me?"
edit on 3/3/13 by solomons path because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MidnightTide
It is a drastic cut, any cuts at this point are negative to an economy that is run by an ever increasing demand of funny money. The QE that the FED is running at this point will be implemented until everything collapses.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
The problem is the dollars aren't generally aimed to departments or even generalized programs. They are SPECIFIC. They target the most visible and most felt things one might imagine 10's of billions in cuts could impact. This was the design of the White House with the purpose (I really do believe) of making a consequence so severe, Congress wouldn't fail at making a deal. Oops...
Originally posted by Tattiio
reply to post by solomons path
where you are wrong is that only an idiot would not be talking about cutting. You have revenue in one hand, and then you spend in the other. If the spend weighs more than revenue, you must make cuts. This would be a bit more clear if the President ever published a budget. By the way, he is the only president to not have a budget five years in a row. You need to stop drinking the coolaid and realize what the reality of the situation is. We are going broke. I could care less abouit polotics, but bankruptcy I do care about. I would hate to see the entire goverment shut down for an extended period of time over this.