It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
1love
noun ˈləv
Definition of LOVE
a (1) : strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties (2) : attraction based on sexual desire : affection and tenderness felt by lovers (3) : affection based on admiration, benevolence, or common interests
b : an assurance of affection
2
: warm attachment, enthusiasm, or devotion
3
a : the object of attachment, devotion, or admiration
tyr·an·ny
noun ˈtir-ə-nē
plural tyr·an·nies
Definition of TYRANNY
1
: oppressive power ; especially : oppressive power exerted by government
2
a : a government in which absolute power is vested in a single ruler; especially : one characteristic of an ancient Greek city-state
So according to these definitions, we have an emotion of attachment, devotion, and/or admiration vs an oppressive power or a government in which absolute power belongs to a single individual.
So tell me, ATS: can love and tyranny be mutually inclusive? If not, where do you draw the line?
By your definitions there, there are millions of examples of people who have been "devoted" (love) to oppressive governments, so that's kind of a pointless question.
The reason why I bring it up is because many people don't think God is a tyrant but is a loving, sovereign, and holy God/Father. So to those people the premise cannot be addressed as written.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by adjensen
By your definitions there, there are millions of examples of people who have been "devoted" (love) to oppressive governments, so that's kind of a pointless question.
Not at all. We're humans - this question is in regards to a divine being. There's a whole different set of standards in play here.
By your definitions there, there are millions of examples of people who have been "devoted" (love) to oppressive governments, so that's kind of a pointless question.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by adjensen
By your definitions there, there are millions of examples of people who have been "devoted" (love) to oppressive governments, so that's kind of a pointless question.
Not at all. We're humans - this question is in regards to a god. There's a whole different set of standards in play here.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
Wasn't the "Law" of the Old Testament a governmental law!?
10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you. 12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city.
I'm assuming you have an opinion as well, which is why I'm asking you to explain to me why you hold that opinion. I posed a question, and I would appreciate an answer.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by NOTurTypical
The reason why I bring it up is because many people don't think God is a tyrant but is a loving, sovereign, and holy God/Father. So to those people the premise cannot be addressed as written.
So, you don't believe in the God of the Old Testament then. Because clearly, he was a tyrant.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
The Hebrews didn't have separation of Church and State. The Judaic Law was the law of the land. It was handed down by "God" and had to be followed, or be killed.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by adjensen
The Hebrews didn't have separation of Church and State. The Judaic Law was the law of the land. It was handed down by "God" and had to be followed, or be killed.
Who killed King David when he ruled Israel and committed adultery? Who killed King Solomon when he was worshiping those idols? The whole Old Testament is stuffed full of examples of people who flagrantly ignored the Law, it's the predominant theme of the whole text, for pete's sakes.
You have a very convenient read of the Bible, I'll give you that
Originally posted by windword
Actually, the fact that the kings and rich guys got off easy, kinda tells me that the whole Old Testament god guy was a made up god guy anyway.
Do you really believe in a creator god appearing in a burning bush and flying around in a pillar of fire, striking people and cities down?
But if he did exist, he was a tyrant!