It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON — The centerpiece of President Obama's initiative to lower gun violence, a law that would require background checks for nearly all gun purchases, is in danger of stalling in Congress, signaling a steep climb for any potential changes to the nation's gun laws.
Separately, Rep. Robert W. Goodlatte (R-Va.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said he would oppose any expansion of background check requirements. His committee would oversee any gun bills in the House.
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), one of the key negotiators, said this week that any provision that required gun owners to keep records would "kill this bill."
Biden did not mention Coburn by name, but it was the first time the administration publicly acknowledged that the bill was faltering.
That would be a great compromise. As a private seller at times, I would love access to NICS for a quick check to be sure. It would make me feel better anyway....but only as an OPTION and not a required part of a larger registration and tracking system.
Originally posted by buni11687
reply to post by macman
Agreed.
The only thing I support that is a little bit similar to this, is possibly allowing private sellers to access the NICS check system on people buying from them. That is, only if the private seller wants to. No requirement to do the check, and no requirement to keep a record. All up to the seller.
Originally posted by americanwoman
Good riddance. Hands off our gun rights Feds!
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by buni11687
GOOD!!!!! Let it die a slow death.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
That would be a great compromise. As a private seller at times, I would love access to NICS for a quick check to be sure. It would make me feel better anyway....but only as an OPTION and not a required part of a larger registration and tracking system.
Originally posted by buni11687
reply to post by macman
Agreed.
The only thing I support that is a little bit similar to this, is possibly allowing private sellers to access the NICS check system on people buying from them. That is, only if the private seller wants to. No requirement to do the check, and no requirement to keep a record. All up to the seller.
Originally posted by buni11687
reply to post by macman
Agreed.
The only thing I support that is a little bit similar to this, is possibly allowing private sellers to access the NICS check system on people buying from them. That is, only if the private seller wants to. No requirement to do the check, and no requirement to keep a record. All up to the seller.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by TDawgRex
Could we trust politicians to set it up formal enough to have a local FFL handle the check and NOT build in a ton of regulation and registration along with it? Just can't trust those wily politicians. They're worse than that silly Fudd character running around with his shotgun.
Originally posted by James1982
But if you require it to go through an FFL, you turn it into a commercial exchange, a purchase, instead of just the gun being "given" to someone. If it becomes commercial, it would stand to reason it will be illegal to pass down guns to your children, as someone under 21 cannot buy a pistol, and someone under 18 cannot buy anything. But right now you can legally give your children those guns, or allow them to inherit them, but if every single transaction becomes commercial, and required to go through an FFL, I think that might become illegal.
Originally posted by Cynicaleye
You're seriously objecting to a bill would make it harder for the mentally ill and criminals to obtain guns?
Wow. How many Newtown's and aurora's will it take for you to look past your precious hunks of metal. You're embarrassments.