Ancient Geo-Engineering is expanding the Earth

reply to post by All Seeing Eye


This site intrigues me, I will definitely have a good look around at some point and get involved, may see you around.

It will soon be 10 years since this post was originated, but not forgotten. I have discovered many things since then.

Today, Subduction is taught in schools as though it is a biblical truth. More fabricated, manipulated observations are produced to support this train of thought, and less and less counter debate is being put forth, and even, disallowed.

Highly Intelligent and knowledgeable men and women are being forced into accepting this "subduction" scenario, but at their logic core, know, its all a fabrication. Science should Always, Always, start with the Observation. This is the basis to answer questions. But with Subduction, no one has observed the process directly, then a scientific theory as to how this could be is constructed. Subduction is supported by, theory. It is not Science, it is, political science! Isaac Newton did not see a tree and assume it must have unseen apples. He saw the Apple fall to the ground and built his theory upon a "Observation". But that is exactly what a certain segment of the Scientific community is doing, fabricating a tree that drops hidden un see-able, apples. Trust them, they know the apples exist.

What you might not see is, why? Why are these men, women, pushing non science as science? Ulterior motive? Surly its not because they are too unintelligent to see the truth, most are very intelligent, knowledgeable. Monitary gain? Ego that has gone off the rails? Or might there be a deeper commitment to something humanity has been bared from exploring since at least the great flood.

If one looks at history, particularly ancient history we are surprised to find the answer is actually there. The pieces to the "Mystery" can be found and reassembled to produce the "Hidden Apple", metaphorically speaking. The Greatest minds from Sir Issac Newton, Sir Edmund Halley, Plato, the Ancient Greeks, and many more, to include Adam And Eve, and, none other than Jesus and Judas themselves, told us of that "Land Beyond the Poles". That place no mortal shall see with his eyes.

It is the Expanding Earth theory that opens the door to this most ancient "Mystery". If we accept this hidden fact, then our minds then turn to the Mechanism that is responsible for the earths expansion. And the most simple answer is, air. Just like a balloon expanding. But because you have been given a alternate "Religious" explanation, based in political science, your not permitted to search further.

As to the mechanism of the "cover up". Look to the mystery schools. They do not hold the mystery to eventually share the mysteries, they are there, to conceal them. To perceptually keep mankind in a state of ignorance, enslavement, torment. The world is divided at the core, because of them.

For the evidence that supports the Subduction theory as a fiction please review the following. Logic, must dictate.

Plate Tectonics: Subduction Doesn't Happen

* Many Leading Experts Agree: There is tremendous observational evidence in the vicinity of the ocean trenches that contradicts the subduction claims of plate tectonics. On today's program, hear from the world's leading plate tectonics experts openly admitting the extreme contradiction between their theory and the actual ocean depths! And if you've heard of marine geology expert Chris Smoot, you're in for a treat because RSR here publishes this summary of his work by our friend Ellen McHenry!

Example List of Geologists Rejecting Plate Tectonics: Some of the old-earth geologists listed here were identified through New Concepts in Global Tectonics and creationists from rsr.org/wb-hpt#supporters...

Dr. Douglas A. Block (late), Geology Prof., Wheaton College

Cmdr. Sepp Benedickt, US Navy, geology Univ. of Minn., M.S. Naval War College Nat'l Security

Brent Carter, Chief geologist U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Northwest

N.C. Smoot, bathymetry, senior scientist, U.S. Naval Oceanographic Office, MS, USA

______ ________ (anon), Prof. of Geophysics at a top 30 university
Bruce Leybourne, USA Bruce Leybourne, geologist with 30 years experience in analyzing gravity, magnetics, and bathymetry, with NAVO and geophysics dept of Navy.
Yoshihiro Kubota, Japan
Leo Maslov, USA
Per Michaelsen, Mongolia
Karsten Storetvedt, Norway
Valentino Straser, Dept of Science and Environment, UPKL Brussels
Hong-Chun Wu, Formosa Scientific Center, Taiwan
Giovanni Gregori, PhD., Professor, Istituto di Acustica e Sensoristica, Roma, Italy
Arun Bapat, PhD. Former Head Earthquake Engineering - Central Water and Power Research Station, Pune, India
Natarajan Venkatanathan, PhD., Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sastra University, India
Louis Hissink, Research Director, NCGT Journal, Australia
P. M. James, USA
Valentino Straser, Dept of Science & Env, UPKL Brussels
Daniele Cataldi, Radio Emissions Project, Rome
Gabriele Cataldi, Radio Emissions Project, Rome
Haleem Zaman Magsi, ORIC, Karakoram International University, Pakistan
Arthur A Meyerhoff (late), Standard Oil petroleum geologist, Int'l Geological Consultant USA
Dong R. Choi (late), geology researcher Japan and Australia, director of Raax Australia
Irfan Taner, Consulting Geologist USA
A.E.L. Morris, Consulting Geologist USA
W.B. Agocs, Consulting Geologist
M. Kamen-Kaye, Consulting Geologist, Cambridge MA, USA
M.I. Bhat, Wadia Inst. of Himalayan Geology, India
Howard Meyerhoff (late), former administrative secretary of AAAS and editor in chief of the journal Science

Curt Teichert, PhD, prof. at seven universities on three continents, Pres., Int'l Paleolontological Assoc.

Peter Vogt, PhD, UCSB Marine Science Institute

Tad Choi, PhD, decades in oil and gas, New Ventures manager for Petroleum Geo-Services

Origin of mountains, word cloudLouis Hissink, MsC, major mining companies expert in geology and mining; researcher in plasma physics applied to geology, Australia
Cliff D. Ollier, D.Sc. earth science (visiting fellow, Oxford contributor, etc.) Origin of Mountains)
Colin Pain Ph.D. geomorphology (OoM free pdf)
László Attila Horváth, M.S. Geology (paper)
James Maxlow, PhD (expansion tectonics, rejects subduction)
Sir Harold Jeffreys (late), British geophysicist,  Royal Medal of the Royal Society of London
See also geologists, including Dr. Warren Hamilton, who reject the existence of deep magma plumes

Ever Since Wegener: A Brief
History of the Expanding Earth Hypothesis William Carnell Erickson

Plate subduction is believed to occur primarily in the Pacific at the deep trenches in mid-
ocean and along the continental margins. According to the plate theory, seafloor spreading in the
Atlantic, Indian and Arctic oceans causes the plates to converge on the Pacific where they collide
and overlap. When this occurs, one of the plates is subducted beneath the other and it descends
back into the earth's interior (where it is 'made mantle again') along the seismically active
Benioff-Wadati Zone. Subduction into the trenches supposedly eliminates crust as quickly as
seafloor spreading creates it. For every square mile of new crust created by seafloor spreading,
an equal amount of old crust must be consumed by subduction.

Cont:

is subduction real

At www.ncgt.org (the New Concepts in Global Tectonics journal) (June, 2015) some of the mismatches are brought to the reader's attention. A connection between ocean trenches and deep earthquake zones is not always present as should be expected if subduction was taking place. Ocean trenches, rather than subduction zones, appear to be rift like structures (as occur on the land surface) which seems to indicate tensile failure. Not only that, many of the trenches in the Pacific contain horizontally bedded sediments on the basement (at the bottom of the trenches) dating back many millions of years ago – which by itself is very odd. Old sea floor is supposed to be subducting at ocean trenches, down into the Mantle. Clearly, this cannot be the case if trenches have sediments that should have disappeared many moons ago.

Subduction elsewhere (at continental margins for example) is also suspect. Smot et al (2001) in his book, 'Active Margin Geomorphology' found no evidence of seismic activity where subduction is supposed to occur (around the perimeters of the Pacific). Choi (2005) could find no evidence for subduction in Indonesia or at the Juan de Fuca Plate. In other places geological sequences are known to occur across what are thought to be regions of subduction (in the literature) hence being obvious evidence the landscape is not subducting. The author, Vadim Gordienko goes on to say that in spite of all this lack of actual physical evidence for subduction there is an ongoing enthusiasm in settled science for the isomorphic approach to global tectonics (which indicates there is something seriously wrong with the settled science of geology).

Yes, there is something seriously wrong with Science, when it is replaced by Political Science.........

"You can fool some of the people sometimes, but you cant fool all the people, all of the time". Logic, dictates...................