It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For me, one of the most perplexing moments (out of the many) of President Obama’ State of the Union address last week was when he insisted that “as long as countries like China keep going all-in on clean energy, so must we.” So… because China is doing it, we must also relentlessly throw money we do not have at politically favored technologies now so awash in superfluous supply that its all they can do to keep their heads above water?
Germany and Spain have for years fancied themselves forward-thinkers on the green-energy front, and have implemented a bunch of subsidies, standards, and regulations aiming to prop up what it seems environmentalists the world over have deemed to be the holy grails of renewable energy, but the fact that these technologies are not yet pragmatic nor affordable is being made especially stark by Europe’s recession. The fiscal squeeze means that put-upon consumers are rather less willing to finance politicians’ green-energy ambitions than usual, and Germany and Spain are dialing it down in the face of financial reality
Germany subsidizes producers of renewable energy such as solar and wind power in part by imposing a surcharge on household electricity bills. As the industry has grown, demand for the subsidy increased, driving the surcharge higher. …
Fearing a voter backlash from anger over the lopsided financing of green energy, Ms. Merkel’s government on Thursday proposed putting a cap on the green-energy surcharge until the end of 2014 and then restricting any rise in the surcharge after that to no more than 2.5% a year. The government also plans to tighten exemptions, which would force more companies to pay, and achieve a cut in green subsidies of €1.8 billion ($2.42 billion). …
The Spanish parliament took a similar step on Thursday, passing a law that aims to curb rising household electricity costs by cutting aid to the renewable-energy industry. …
Among the changes in the Spanish system, the new law indexes certain subsidies and compensation to an inflation estimate that strips out the effects of energy, food commodities, and tax changes.
German media are thus putting the increase in the surcharge into perspective. As the screenshot from a German news broadcast on Friday (below) shows, the price of electricity only Increased over the past 12 months by three percent, Compared to a five percent increase in the cost of natural gas, a nine percent hike in the cost of gasoline, and a 10 percent increase in the cost of heating oil. The three percent increase in electricity prices is thus fairly close to the general inflation rate of two percent in Germany over the past 12 months.
Germany is a rich country with a thriving economy (the unemployment rate is currently at its lowest level since reunification more than two decades ago), so most people can afford the surcharge, Which is expected to cost the average German household with an annual consumption of 1.500 kilowatt-hours around 60 euros Additionally next year - 5 euros per month. In addition, citizenry is behind more than half of investments in renewables, so Germans are Largely paying this money back to themselves rather than to corporations.
Germany is a rich country with a thriving economy (the unemployment rate is currently at its lowest level since reunification more than two decades ago), so most people can afford the surcharge,
Germany's largest power provider, Eon, posted a net profit of 3.1 billion euros in the first two quarters of this year. Nonetheless, when its CEO Johannes Teyssen expressed concern this year about "energy poverty," he did not announce lower prices for his customers on welfare, but rather called on the government to protect the poor from rising power rates allegedly brought about by renewables.
Despite these profits, Eon and RWE, Germany's second largest power firm, have both announced that they plan to lay off some 11,000 people each, a step that will only increase the number of welfare recipients they claim to be concerned about.
Protecting the poor is a general concern. Unfortunately, Germany does not have any official definition of fuel poverty, nor does it keep any statistics on how many people have had their power switched off because they could not pay their bills, though one estimate put the figure at 200,000 people over the past year.
Then explain the record profits of the German co's. and the 11,000 people that are being laid off per company. That's 22,000 layoffs... How is that for success..
Johannes Teyssen expressed concern this year about "energy poverty," he did not announce lower prices for his customers on welfare, but rather called on the government to protect the poor from rising power rates allegedly brought about by renewables.
Protecting the poor is a general concern. Unfortunately, Germany does not have any official definition of fuel poverty, nor does it keep any statistics on how many people have had their power switched off because they could not pay their bills, though one estimate put the figure at 200,000 people over the past year. The UK speaks of "fuel poverty" when a household spends more than 10 percent of its income on water heating, lights, appliances and cooking. Germans currently only spend 2.5 percent of their household budgets on electricity on the average, with only 0.3 percent devoted to funding green power.
Solar subsidies cost German consumers billions of dollars a year and are widely regarded as inefficient. Even environmentalists are concerned that Berlin's focus on solar comes at the detriment of other renewables. But the solar industry has a powerful lobby, and politicians have proven powerless to resist.