It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Here's a screenshot from the page in his photo album "Fun Stuff" on his Facebook page:
So we can see that all currently considered theories do NOT explain what is actually seen in the behavior of this pulsar. But this behavior is easily explained when you actually understand how a pulsar works. Pulsars are NOT rapidly spinning neutron stars emitting a beam that sweeps through space like a lighthouse beam. PF 2 will explain and show with experimental proof how a pulsar actually functions.
Check out what Einstein writes in the "Evolution of Physics" on page 258. Here is the quote "There would be no place in our new physics for both field and matter, field being the only reality" A truly brilliant man ahead of his time.
Please stop dragging this discussion off-topic with your diversionary tactics. For the final time, I am asking you about your conclusions. Explain the capacity in which you are speaking when you draw such conclusions as well as the basis for your comment regarding peer review. I'm not asking about my conclusions on the video, I'm asking you about your conclusions. If you are unwilling or incapable of doing so then I have nothing more to say on the matter.
Please stop dragging this discussion off-topic with your diversionary tactics. For the final time, I am asking you about your conclusions. Explain the capacity in which you are speaking when you draw such conclusions as well as the basis for your comment regarding peer review. I'm not asking about my conclusions on the video, I'm asking you about your conclusions. If you are unwilling or incapable of doing so then I have nothing more to say on the matter.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by john_bmth
Her two cents isn't the subject topic of the thread....The video is....Quit dragging threads off-topic by attacking the people and views on it; get over yourself man..I don't blame her for ignoring you, it's the path everybody should be taking. Including me; enjoy the video, or don't...
Originally posted by moebius
reply to post by MamaJ
Why should I waste my time watching the video when the field lines picture posted above is already showing how completely nuts(not related to what can be observed directly) his theory is?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
He's saying that this model is incorrect:
And that this is what the fields around all matter look like:
Originally posted by ImaFungi
to me these are the exact same descriptions..
Originally posted by Mary Rose
two opposing bowl shaped fields.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by ImaFungi
to me these are the exact same descriptions..
I disagree. The traditional bar magnet type field illustrated with the model of the electron does not account for two opposing bowl shaped fields.
I'm curious. Did you watch the video? Are you planning to discuss the video and his subsequent videos and .pdf when it comes out?
Originally posted by ImaFungi
if you look at the photo of two oppositely spinning electrons you originally posted, and look at the imediate top two and bottom two field lines,, they seem to form a V,, this made me think that that was the "hole or vortex imaged in his image"
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by ImaFungi
if you look at the photo of two oppositely spinning electrons you originally posted, and look at the imediate top two and bottom two field lines,, they seem to form a V,, this made me think that that was the "hole or vortex imaged in his image"
The Vs simply continue on to the opposite pole in the old model, rather than curving up and looping around, or curving down and looping around, to form donuts with the electron sandwiched in between.
I don't know how to model your photo, though.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
the two lines that make up the letter V ( and representing two field lines in the image do curve around.... the space in between the lines of that V, and in the model... the open space in between the lines, would perhaps be the vortex he modeled) ..