It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alien spaceship Lands on Moon [ Google Moon ]

page: 1
23
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 02:47 AM
link   
An alien spaceship has been spotted on the Moon's surface at this coordinate : 25°19'50.27"N 2°18'13.34"E
Go check out yourself using the Google Earth software before google removes it
The craft is around 180 - 190 meters long and 30 - 40 meters wide



What is your point of view regarding this object seen on the moon ?






posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 02:58 AM
link   
That looks so trekkie.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Trueman
 


yeah just like in star trek



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:00 AM
link   
Thats quite incredibleit looks like a spacecraft out of Startrek or even Eve. The future in now.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:06 AM
link   
reply to post by AthlonSavage
 


Ya Athlon
The future is now


+4 more 
posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:12 AM
link   
I'm gonna go with a no on this one. Even with the scary music
edit on 23-1-2013 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:12 AM
link   
Could be a moon base built by "the secret" military space core.

It sure doesn't look like a natural artifact.


+35 more 
posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32
I'm gonna go with a no on this one. Even with the scary music
edit on 23-1-2013 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)


Just because you said no , i'm going to have to say yes!



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:25 AM
link   
Would like to see another pic of exact same spot with it gone
for me to believe it's not just rocks



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by PLAYERONE01

Originally posted by bknapple32
I'm gonna go with a no on this one. Even with the scary music
edit on 23-1-2013 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)


Just because you said no , i'm going to have to say yes!


Then sadly, you'd be wrong.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:26 AM
link   
That's an old one.

If I'm not mistaken that is a Lunar Orbiter (not Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) photo, taken sometime in the 1960s.

It looks like some scratch in the photo (they were chemical, not digital photos).
edit on 23/1/2013 by ArMaP because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by bknapple32

Originally posted by PLAYERONE01

Originally posted by bknapple32
I'm gonna go with a no on this one. Even with the scary music
edit on 23-1-2013 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)


Just because you said no , i'm going to have to say yes!


Then sadly, you'd be wrong.


I don't think so, by the way that is a big call , considering you can neither confirm nor deny what the anomaly in the pic is, so by you just calling the thread a generalized no you took yourself out of the equation. Bu-dy!



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:43 AM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 





That's an old one.

Indeed it is
Evidence Of Image Tampering On Google Moon



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 03:43 AM
link   
reply to post by Equiinox
 


It's real. I bet you that movie "iron sky" has TONS of truths in it.Where the Nazi's have secret bases inside and underneath the craters on the moon



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 04:05 AM
link   
Looks as if 2 Discs like Spaceships have landed and not 1.
2e



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 04:42 AM
link   
Looks like a soft landing to me, no ejecta from a crater (hard landing) no furrow from an almost horizontal landing, so what ever it is, its very light, or its under control from some form of cognitive being. Occums razor......



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 04:46 AM
link   
reply to post by PLAYERONE01
 


You're right. Chances are it's a 200 meter long flying saucer landing on the moon that one guy on YouTube happened to find using Google moon. A source many here, including myself, think is doctored whenever Google is told. Instead of just being a photo error from a telescope hundreds of thousands of miles away. Or a rock formation. .

Yep. You're right. Definitely. No way theres a 99% chance its nothing more than an anomaly. More like 50/50.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 05:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by PLAYERONE01

Originally posted by bknapple32
I'm gonna go with a no on this one. Even with the scary music
edit on 23-1-2013 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)


Just because you said no , i'm going to have to say yes!


Ouch, too much critical thinking.

I'm going with no. because logic tells me. Not because it's cool.



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 05:44 AM
link   
Wait till you see them up close..WOAH!



posted on Jan, 23 2013 @ 07:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Equiinox
 


2012 came ... and went ... and nothing happened; absolutely nothing of even the slightest remarkable-ness regarding UFOs, Alien disclosure ... nothing.

It's been how many decades now that 'modern' UFO/Aliens belief has occupied the collective unconscious, and out of all these how many decades have we once had disclosure? No.

Yet, so many of you are still so gullible, so eager to believe, despite nothing, absolutely nothing of any remark ever happening.




new topics

top topics



 
23
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join