It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Trubeeleever
.
Have you looked through your photo archives to see if any other anomalies have appeared in them? If so there might be a common denominator which could help you understand the appearance of this one.
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to post by StareDad
the 3 sequential pictures show that the photographer indeed did change locations... or did the stationary tree move closer to you?
Originally posted by HelenConway
It defo was not my index finger - I took three pics one after another, my position did not change,
so, your earlier statement that you did not move nor was your camera moved is incorrect---- how are we supposed to believe the rest of your yarn?edit on 22-1-2013 by St Udio because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by StareDad
reply to post by St Udio
If you reply to the right one, it looks less confusing Because now, it looks like the opposite of what I said.
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to post by StareDad
the 3 sequential pictures show that the photographer indeed did change locations... or did the stationary tree move closer to you?
Originally posted by HelenConway
It defo was not my index finger - I took three pics one after another, my position did not change,
so, your earlier statement that you did not move nor was your camera moved is incorrect---- how are we supposed to believe the rest of your yarn?edit on 22-1-2013 by St Udio because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Trubeeleever
On the other end of the scale, quite a few years ago my brother went to Port Arthur in Tasmania and visited the site of the Port Arthur Massacre. He didn't have a digital camera, but an old "film" type camera. He took a photo of his wife standing in the doorway of some of the old colonial ruins, and upon development they could see a shadow of a little girl and it looked as if she was holding his wife's hand.
Have you looked through your photo archives to see if any other anomalies have appeared in them? If so there might be a common denominator which could help you understand the appearance of this one.
your posts and views are well received (nice 'stach on your avatar)
Originally posted by StareDad
reply to post by HelenConway
You asked how the finger near the flash can produce this effect.
The finger will reflect the light in different ways, one of them is directly into the lense, where it maybe traverses the lens in an angle like shining through glas but from the side. This overexposes your cmos and thus, creates this effect. You can try it yourself and replicate.
Originally posted by StareDad
reply to post by HelenConway
Thats the kind of handling such things, I like. Though, the other guy wants to display you as a hoaxer, I´m glad you take the effort to replicate. Something you do not see often here. Forget the other one, he probably had to "debunk" so much lately, that he just oversaw that you did not claimed anything (ghosts or such). Heads up.