It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Society has cheapened sport and all competition and I'm afraid a growing number of people who feel like "losers" is entering the adult world broken and afraid because of it.
Originally posted by tgidkp
being that winning, itself, is the biological imperative, it seems at once to be the most and least obvious of all conspiracies. if any group seeks to conspire, it is surely to WIN some thing or another.
families ...
communities ...
corporations ...
bullies ...
gangs ...
sports teams ...
...all, in it to win it.
being the classic "born loser", it's that last one there (sports) that turned me off to the whole notion of competition which, over several decades of living, has turned me into a pacifist in the truest sense. I simply do not care to win. anything. ever. (...and I HATE football season.)
as you might guess, this has introduced many distinct problems into my life. but the reason I write this is not because of the problems, but because of the benefits. and in my own way, I am putting my own voice into this god-awful atrocious "gun debate".
so, being that it HAS BEEN the biological imperative for aeons, must it continue to be so?
I have long been fond of the idea that the "next phase" of evolution will rely not upon physical survival, which along with guns and wars, will become a relic of the past. no, the future is the evolution of ideas and information. it's the losers, the poor kids that get their butts kicked on the playground and those whom are least "fit" in the darwinian sense, that pave the way to a utopian star-trek type society.
we're sure as hell not going to get there with GUNS.
perhaps the reason people cling to their guns is because they have not made peace with their inner loser?
Originally posted by tgidkp
reply to post by Unity_99
these days, killing (dying) seems much less noble and much more like rooting for "your team".
but I will admit that naivete is an unpleasant side-effect of pacifism. I do not wish for good people to die.edit on 18-1-2013 by tgidkp because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tgidkp
reply to post by EyesWideShut
that is a very interesting point.
it was actually during the period of my army enlistment that I completely embraced my voluntary loser approach. ironically, the last time I was on the firing range I qualified as a sharpshooter.