It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
This is horrifically demented. Forcing the soldiers to take the vaccination without giving them any information about possible side effects was evil enough. Please take the time to read the article as it has an email address giving you the opportunity to tell the Commissioner of this Bioethics program what you think about using children as guinea pigs for experimentation on a vaccine that has ruined the health of many soldiers and its effects are well documented. The youtube video of this ex Marine is a MUST WATCH to know what this can do to an adult. This is criminal child abuse and I beg you to let people know what is going on. Stand up and deliver!
www.youtube.com...
www.theglobaldispatch.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Unity_99
Oh really. He should volunteer himself and his own family then. But I don't understand why that particular virus is in existence.
Bacillus anthracis is a relatively common spore-forming soil bacterium found rarely in the U.S. but more commonly in some areas of the world as an endogenous infectious agent. Bacillus anthracis infection can cause death within six days of exposure to a lethal dose, usually by inhalation of spores. To be effective as a BW agent a microorganism must be highly infectious, very pathogenic and stable in the air and environment for the period of time needed for dissemination and infection of large numbers of people. Spore-forming bacteria like Bacillus anthracis are ideal for this purpose.
Originally posted by madenusa
EXECUTIVE ORDERS ISSUED.
Teddy Roosevelt 3
Others to FDR NONE
FDR 11 in 16 years
Truman 5 in 7 years
Ike 2 in 8 years
Kennedy 4 in 3 years
LBJ 4 in 5 years
Nixon 1 in 6 years
Ford 3 in 2 years
Carter 3 in 4 years
Reagan 5 in 8 years
Bush 3 in 4 years
Clinton 15 in 8 years
George W. Bush 62 in 8 years
Obama 923 in 3 1/2 years!
All Presidents have issued Executive Orders, for reasons
that vary, some more than others.
When a President issued as many as 30 Ex. Orders during a term in Office,
people thought there was something Amiss.
Originally posted by Shotgun Skeptic
You stupid losers voted him in. Dumasses.
Originally posted by eLPresidente
Originally posted by xedocodex
The Obama Administration is NOT seeking to test the Anthrax vaccine on children.
So many lies and hoaxes, it's just ridiculous.
Another claim that its a hoax? lies? ridiculous? OH boy...
Is the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary NOT nominated by the POTUS for his or her term?
It doesn't even matter who is POTUS, any administration that allows this should be criticized.edit on 11-1-2013 by eLPresidente because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by madenusa
He is a devout Muslim; do not be fooled. Look at his czars... Anti-business. anti-American. As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Barack Hussein Obama is following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University ... they outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system with government spending and entitlement demands.
Originally posted by Camperguy
Originally posted by Shotgun Skeptic
You stupid losers voted him in. Dumasses.
I didnt vote for him, the electoral College did. Another one of those flaws in the system, like the executive order.
Bill
He is no fool. He is not incompetent. On the contrary, he is brilliant. He knows exactly what he's doing. He is purposely overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic crisis and social chaos - thereby destroying capitalism and our country from within.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
It is not a request to test on children at all - that is pure scaremongering.
It is a discussion as to whether OR NOT it would be ethical to test on children - many vaccine proponents say there is no point - the chances of an anthrax attack are miniscule, and how would you figure out the results anyway n the absence of actual anthrax?
The discussion itself, rather than the stupid scaremongering headlines, can be found here - note that it is "establishment" bioethicists who are opposing any suggestion of carrying out such trials.
Originally posted by LadyGreenEyes
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
It is not a request to test on children at all - that is pure scaremongering.
It is a discussion as to whether OR NOT it would be ethical to test on children - many vaccine proponents say there is no point - the chances of an anthrax attack are miniscule, and how would you figure out the results anyway n the absence of actual anthrax?
The discussion itself, rather than the stupid scaremongering headlines, can be found here - note that it is "establishment" bioethicists who are opposing any suggestion of carrying out such trials.
Come on; the ONLY reason to discuss the issue is because someone wants to do it. If no one did, discussion would not be necessary.