It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
IT IS like storm-proofing a building with a paper towel. From 2015, the world's banks will be forced to keep a proportion of their assets in reserve, to prevent a repeat of the 2008 banking crisis. But economists say the rules will make little difference.
... A small number of studies have investigated the macroeconomic implications of these new rules and shown the adverse impact on GDP growth...
A particular feature of the credit crisis 2008 were the importance of financial links between banks, either through interbank loans, payment systems or OTC derivatives positions.
While such links have received significant attention in the literature in recent years, the impact of capital and liquidity regulation on bank failures and systemic risk propagating through these links is still outstanding.
A common feature of all of these models is that they view banks as isolated entities through focussing on accounting ratios of these banks. It is not taken into account that banks are highly interconnected with each other through interbank loans, derivatives positions and payment systems. Hence the failure of one bank can have an impact on the default of other banks and even threaten their survival. This systemic risk and its implications has been ignored in the literature on bank prediction thus far, although much of the empirical work referred to above is conducted during time periods of sustained systemic risk. Furthermore, it is clear from the data on bank failures that most failures occur as part of banking crises rather than being isolated events.
The lack of publicly available data on actual bilateral exposures makes it more difficult to obtain a model that captures fully all empirical aspects of interbank loans, relying on additional assumptions to make it operational.
Originally posted by kwakakev
It is not just greed at fault here, but the distribution of power as well.
Greed is the fundamental cause for the uneven distribution of power, or even the desire to hold "power" over another creature.
Maybe some kind of holy trinity also needs to be established for the banking sector and power of money?
Originally posted by kwakakev
reply to post by jasonl1983
Greed is the fundamental cause for the uneven distribution of power, or even the desire to hold "power" over another creature.
So are all dog and other pet owners greedy?