It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Given that the EU constitution has been approved, what parts of it should we press ahead with now
The plan of Brussels is to implement as much of the constitution as they can before it has even been ratified. In Britain's case it is not just asylum, it is also justice and home affairs, where basically, we are seeing moves towards the European codification of criminal law.
Originally posted by bigdanprice
I have no agreement with Racist, right wing scaremongering perputrated in the Daily Mail, and Mail on Sunday, Newspapers in the UK. They are reactionary and wrong...
ALTHOUGH...
Originally posted by UK Wizard
Source: Mail on Sunday: Front Page and Page 5
People say the Britain is being slowly consumed by the monster that is the EU.... and I agree with them.
Britain will soon surrender it's immigration and asylum policy to Brussels, who wishes a EU wide immigration and asylum policy.
This is reflected in a question put by MEP Nigel Farage to Peter Mandelson and other EU commisoners.
Nigel Farage asked:
Given that the EU constitution has been approved, what parts of it should we press ahead with now
Mr Mandelson replyed with:
The plan of Brussels is to implement as much of the constitution as they can before it has even been ratified. In Britain's case it is not just asylum, it is also justice and home affairs, where basically, we are seeing moves towards the European codification of criminal law.
A spokeman for Mr Blunkett confirmed that tomorrow's meeting would see Britain agreeing to surrender it's veto on asylum issues.
Why should we remain a member of a corrupt and Burocratic alliance that wish's to see the end to Britain's Sovereignty and replace it wish a politically correct mess it calls the EU constitution.
it's either
OR
Who do you put first, your own country or a alliance you never voted to join?
(Opinions are extra welcome from those not in Europe)
[edit on 24-10-2004 by UK Wizard]
Who do you put first, your own country or a alliance you never voted to join?
A spokeman for Mr Blunkett confirmed that tomorrow's meeting would see Britain agreeing to surrender it's veto on asylum issues.
The Mail was famously one of the UK's Hitler supporting rags.....and some might say it's instincts remain similar- ish.
......and what sort of cretin thinks that the other EU countries aren't interested in coming up with a sensible and workable asylum system anyway?
Not at all! The EU member states do not trade just amongst themselves, but with countries throughout the world. Although Switzerland and Norway are not members, both do proportionately more trade with the EU than we do; this doesn't say much for the so-called 'advantages' of our EU membership
Britain pays �25 million a day into the EU budget. Yes, we get some money back, but this is mostly in the form of 'grants' for projects that are not always of our choosing, and market-distorting farm subsidies. We are effectively begging for our own money. EU tax harmonisation measures - especially the planned with holding tax - will do great damage to our financial institutions. The job losses that result won't be confined to the City of London
Yes - if we stay in the EU! Britain is a member of the UN, NATO, G7/8 and other world organisations. When the EU becomes one country - with common economic, foreign and defence policies - Britain will lose its seat and its voice. Britain still attends International Monetary Fund meetings as a full member. Germany, France and other euro zone countries have had to give up their seats - their 'interests' are now represented by the European Central Bank!
Originally posted by bigdanprice
People in the UK have always had a natrual distrust with Europe and its institutions, we have a history of warfare with them for thousands of years. Its ingrained in the natrual consciousness.
Originally posted by BillyTheCat
This may be the reason why 150,000 - 175,000 'middle England' English people with families are emigrating every year. This is all well and good, but in a few years time the UK will start to suffer from a skills shortage, caused by disenchanted Brits abandoning the UK.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Where are those families emigrating to?
Originally posted by cs2112
bigdanprice and sminkypingy
why dont you F@@k off and live someplace else . when Britannia does rule again, and she will, people like you will be the first to be dealt with.
Originally posted by ArMaP
The UK may had lots of wars with other European countries, but it also has the oldest aliance in the world between two countries with Portugal.
Also, its normal that a country with the geographic situation of the UK should have problems only with other European countries, I do not think that the UK could be at war with China in the 15th century.
And you forget that most of those wars were caused by religious or "family" reasons, as most European countries share the origin of their royal families.