It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ismail
Meanwile, in the real world, a bunch of kids just died in Africa because they couldn't AFFORD food and medicine.
Originally posted by ShotGunRum
So what if he was?
Originally posted by ltheghost
Originally posted by ShotGunRum
So what if he was?
This was exactly what I was thinking! So what!?!?!
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by ltheghost
Originally posted by ShotGunRum
So what if he was?
This was exactly what I was thinking! So what!?!?!
Take ten minutes to read the thread and you'll have your answer -- take special note of those posters from South Africa, who have personal experience.
not only what you said but i find it astonishingly frequent that the only "society" used to explain this "theory" in function is the ever SO fictional, Star Trek series
Yet here we sit, without an answer to that simple question, leading to the conclusion that your "true" communism is a fantasy, and what is closest to your ideal has been tried, and not merely failed, but failed in such a spectacular fashion that it took perhaps a hundred million living, breathing human beings with it.
Originally posted by domasio
I don't see why people have such hatred for communism. In it's essence, it's probably one of the best ideologies that there is.
You shouldn't bemoan the ideology, only the people that hijack it and take advantage to become a dictator in an ideology that is not supposed to have one leader.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by Malcher
I think that IS the problem though. Why the need to constantly make excuses? May as well say: Are you going to believe me, or what you see with your own eyes?
Origins of the conflict
The conflict's origin goes back to land disputes between semi-nomadic livestock herders and those who practice sedentary agriculture.
Since the population of Darfur is predominantly Muslim, the conflict may not be only about race or religion, but about resources as the nomadic tribes facing drought are going after the territory of sedentary farmers.
Arab Apartheid Allegation
In the beginning of 1991, non-Arabs of the Zaghawa people of Sudan complained that they were victims of an intensifying Arab apartheid campaign. Sudanese Arabs, who control the government, are widely referred to as practising apartheid against Sudan's non-Arab citizens. The government is accused of "deftly manipulat(ing) Arab solidarity" to carry out policies of apartheid and ethnic cleansing against non-Arabs in Darfur.
The Janjaweed were put at the center of the new counter-insurgency strategy. Though the government consistently denied supporting the Janjaweed, military resources were poured into Darfur and the Janjaweed were outfitted as a paramilitary force, complete with communication equipment and some artillery. The military planners were doubtlessly aware of the probable consequences of such a strategy: similar methods undertaken in the Nuba Mountains and around the southern oil fields during the 1990s had resulted in massive human rights violations and forced displacements
The better-armed Janjaweed quickly gained the upper hand. By the spring of 2004, several thousand people – mostly from the non-Arab population – had been killed and as many as a million more had been driven from their homes, causing a major humanitarian crisis in the region. The crisis took on an international dimension when over 100,000 refugees poured into neighbouring Chad, pursued by Janjaweed militiamen, who clashed with Chadian government forces along the border. More than 70 militiamen and 10 Chadian soldiers were killed in one gun battle in April. A United Nations observer team reported that non-Arab villages were singled out while Arab villages were left untouched:
Destroyed villages as of August 2004
The 23 Fur villages in the Shattaya Administrative Unit have been completely depopulated, looted and burnt to the ground (the team observed several such sites driving through the area for two days). Meanwhile, dotted alongside these charred locations are unharmed, populated and functioning Arab settlements. In some locations, the distance between a destroyed Fur village and an Arab village is less than 500 meters.[40]
Lenin took his philosophy directly from Marx ... so he perverted it to suit his desires, what makes you or anyone else think such subversion wouldn't be repeated ?
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Malcher
I think that IS the problem though. Why the need to constantly make excuses? May as well say: Are you going to believe me, or what you see with your own eyes?
It's only a problem because people are kept ignorant.
The Bolsheviks could never had taken state power under the guise of "communism", if the people were all educated about what communism really was.
The state keeps people ignorant for a reason. Most people are ignorant about what communism/socialism actually is, and that is no accident.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Malcher
I think that IS the problem though. Why the need to constantly make excuses? May as well say: Are you going to believe me, or what you see with your own eyes?
It's only a problem because people are kept ignorant.
The Bolsheviks could never had taken state power under the guise of "communism", if the people were all educated about what communism really was.
The state keeps people ignorant for a reason. Most people are ignorant about what communism/socialism actually is, and that is no accident.
The word ‘anarchy’ comes from the Greek anarkhia, meaning contrary to authority or without a ruler, and was used in a derogatory sense until 1840, when it was adopted by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon to describe his political and social ideology. Proudhon argued that organization without government was both possible and desirable. In the evolution of political ideas, anarchism can be seen as an ultimate projection of both liberalism and socialism, and the differing strands of anarchist thought can be related to their emphasis on one or the other of these...
Colin Ward, 'Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction' ch.1, p.1, 1995
The mainstream of anarchist propaganda for more than a century has been anarchist-communism, which argues that property in land, natural resources, and the means of production should be held in mutual control by local communities, federating for innumerable joint purposes with other communes. It differs from state socialism in opposing the concept of any central authority. Some anarchists prefer to distinguish between anarchist-communism and collectivist anarchism in order to stress the obviously desirable freedom of an individual or family to possess the resources needed for living, while not implying the right to own the resources needed by others.
Anarcho-syndicalism puts its emphasis on the organized industrial workers who could, through a ‘social general strike’, expropriate the possessors of capital and thus engineer a workers’ take-over of industry and administration. Colin Ward, 'Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction'. ch.1 p.2, 1995
The 20th century experienced or witnessed every variety of state socialism, and learned that if its rulers are ruthless enough, they can impose, for a while, the most bizarre regimes and describe them as socialism. As socialism has been grossly misrepresented, so anarchism suffers from the widely held view that it is simply another variety of millenarianism, the belief in the eventual arrival, ‘after the revolution’, of a period of ultimate happiness when all the problems that beset humanity will have been solved, permanently. Colin Ward, 'Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction'. ch.3 p.31, 1995
Colin Ward (14 August 1924 – 11 February 2010) was a British anarchist writer. He has been called "one of the greatest anarchist thinkers of the past half century, and a pioneering social historian." [1]
As Socialism in general, Anarchism was born among the people; and it will continue to be full of life and creative power only as long as it remains a thing of the people. From the book 'Modern Science and Anarchism' p.5, Peter Kropotkin, 1908
Kropotkin advocated a communist society free from central government and based on voluntary associations between workers. He wrote many books, pamphlets and articles, the most prominent being The Conquest of Bread and Fields, Factories and Workshops, and his principal scientific offering, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. He also contributed the article on anarchism to the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition.[1]
Is it necessary to repeat here the irrefutable arguments of Socialism which no bourgeois economist has yet succeeded in disproving? What is property, what is capital in their present form? For the capitalist and the property owner they mean the power and the right, guaranteed by the State, to live without working. And since neither property nor capital produces anything when not fertilized by labor - that means the power and the right to live by exploiting the work of someone else, the right to exploit the work of those who possess neither property nor capital and who thus are forced to sell their productive power to the lucky owners of both. From 'The Capitalist System' p.1, Michael Bakunin 1814-1876, Anarcho-Collectivist.
Convinced that freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice and that Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality. The League [for Peace and Freedom] loudly proclaims the necessity of a radical social and economic reconstruction, having for its aim the emancipation of people's labor from the yoke of capital and property owners, a reconstruction based upon strict justice - neither juridical nor theological nor metaphysical justice, but simply human justice - upon positive science and upon the widest freedom.
Anarchism is stateless socialism. 'Stateless Socialism: Anarchism', Mikhail Bakunin 1814-1876, Anarcho-Collectivist.
Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin (Russian: Михаил Александрович Бакунин; IPA: [mʲɪxɐˈil ˌbaˈkunʲin]) (30 May [O.S. 18 May] 1814 – 1 July 1876) was a Russian revolutionary, philosopher, and theorist of collectivist anarchism. He has also often been called the father of anarchist theory in general.[2]
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by ltheghost
Again, take a few minutes to read the thread and see what South Africans have to say about him. Ignoring that is to simply accept what the mainstream media has painted him as being.
You should educate yourself before trying to tell me I'm wrong mate. I might sound arrogant but one thing I am 100% sure on is this.
But not everyone in the ANC agreed with the policy of non- racialism. A small minority of members who called themselves Africanists, opposed the Freedom Charter. They objected to the ANC`s growing co-operation with whites and Indians, who they described as foreigners. They were also suspicious of communists who, they felt, brought a foreign ideology into the struggle.
Originally posted by Malcher
Your posts are full of antiquation.
“libertarian was a term created by nineteenth-century European anarchists not by contemporary American right-wing proprietarians.” Murray Bookchin The Ecology of Freedom p. 57, 1982