It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rubicant13
My contribution to this would have to be that Monsanto has been lobbying many politicians in congress, even California, donating generous amounts in hoping to mainstream their advertising for their GMO products. Monsanto has many politicians in their pockets.
Originally posted by foodstamp
Originally posted by Rubicant13
My contribution to this would have to be that Monsanto has been lobbying many politicians in congress, even California, donating generous amounts in hoping to mainstream their advertising for their GMO products. Monsanto has many politicians in their pockets.
Yes, but this was a vote by the people. And it's my understanding that it was overwhelmingly defeated. I can't figure out how or why! Any insight?
Originally posted by Echo3Foxtrot
People were fed "research" that genmod food is safe and still natural. I had people coming to my door to talk to me about it. That and a thousand (exaggeration) flyers in my mail box.
Their main argument was that it would fiscally impact the state budget and more cuts would have to be made from schools, police, etc. to recover from the impact prop 37 would create. It was mostly a fiscal scare tactic like most everything else they were putting up for a vote.
Originally posted by GreenGlassDoor
reply to post by foodstamp
Probably for the same reason they voted for Prop 30.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Rubicant13
These graphics are so handy..
Originally posted by iwilliam
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Rubicant13
These graphics are so handy..
Can you give the source for this please?
Can you give the source for this please?
Source
Food, biotech and chemical companies have spent over $45 million on the No on 37 campaign, and 93% of that money has come from out of state. Natural food companies and other supporters have spent over $8 million on the Yes on 37 campaign, most of it also coming from out of state.
Requires labeling of food sold to consumers made from plants or animals with genetic material changed in specified ways. Prohibits marketing such food, or other processed food, as “natural.” Provides exemptions. Fiscal Impact: Increased annual state costs from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $1 million to regulate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. Additional, but likely not significant, governmental costs to address violations under the measure.
WHAT YOUR VOTE MEANS
YES A YES vote on this measure means: Genetically engineered foods sold in California would have to be specifically labeled as being genetically engineered.
NO A NO vote on this measure means: Genetically engineered foods sold in California would continue not to have specific labeling requirements.
ARGUMENTS
PRO Proposition 37 gives us the right to know what is in the food we eat and feed to our families. It simply requires labeling of food produced using genetic engineering, so we can choose whether to buy those products or not. We have a right to know.
CON Prop. 37 is a deceptive, deeply flawed food labeling scheme, full of special-interest exemptions and loopholes. Prop. 37 would: create new government bureaucracy costing taxpayers millions, authorize expensive shakedown lawsuits against farmers and small businesses, and increase family grocery bills by hundreds of dollars per year.
Source
In late September, 61 percent of polled Californians supported Prop 37. But just a month later, that opinion flipped upside down, and only 39 percent were in support of the proposition, with 51 percent in opposition of it.
permaculturenews.org...
Prop 37 Vote-Fraud Update: 3.3 million Votes Still Uncounted (November 12, 2012) When the networks and other media outlets made the early call on election night, claiming Prop 37 had gone down to defeat, there were millions of votes still uncounted. I just checked the California Secretary of State’s website, which is the official center for vote results, and there are 3,334,495 votes that remain unprocessed.
**** Does anyone know how to get a linked image to show in the post????