Here we go. I'm ready for the doodoo that will rain upon me after writing this one
For the last months I've dedicated my leftover hours to study archeo-astronomical alignments/coincidences in old sites around the world. Some of you
maybe remember a thread of mine where I weighed the possibility of two very well known sites showing an ancient map when superimposed on one another.
The sites in question were Giza Pyramids and the Pyramids in Teotihuacàn. In the thread I mentioned a few vague theories that didn't quite catch on.
But I misinterpreted the overlay. Before releasing I have to state why I think these two sites have a special meaning.
First of all, the measurements used in building. A quote from my previous thread.
The measurement that was used in Teotihuacàn is not known, but a very good estimate of it has been done. And the result is that one standard unit had
to be 1.0594m. This measure sits well into all buildings and distances. Divide that measure with two and you get very close to the Egyptian Cubit,
52.97cm.
Then you can't count out the number of the big pyramids, three at each site. The biggest pyramids share almost the same base length (a very small
difference only). The Pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacàn has a height half the Khufu Pyramid. They both correspond to a very important number that is
3.1415 (base-height ratio). At Giza this is 3.14/2 and at Teotihuacàn it is 3.14/4. The architectural similarities was the reason I overlaid them in
the first place.
By overlaying them they form a beautiful site map where the relations are just perfect. But that's not the point here... how to interpret is the
catch.
Being a fan of a 'mysterious ancient lost civilization' that has given our forefathers their knowledge I will make a few points. Surviving cataclysmic
events they had to make sure we would have the tools to predict these events and therefore maybe survive the coming onslaught. So they built large
sites that served as surveying tools for earthquakes. Teotihuacàn being one, Angkor Wat being another one. Both of the sites had a 'pool' that was
filled with water (Angkor still has water) and the water worked as an instrument reacting to the resonance of the earth tectonic movements. As
talented star gazers and believers in natural cycles they somehow managed to resolve and tie these events to our cycles in the cosmos. To be more
precise, the used the precession as a clock, or a tool to tell when things would occur. The Khufu Pyramid and the Sphinx were built as a big
precessional clock that showed the relevance of the cycle. The Olmec Calendar (that has its roots in Egypt), later known as the Mayan Calendar was
fine tuned to show us the exact date.
So what about the two overlaid sites, do they serve as a clock too. I think so, and they show us exactly 'when', but they do not answer the question
of 'what'.
This picture is showing a specific time, a specific planetary formation in the future.
The site map relates to the inner solar system at the date of 31.3.2018 - 4.4.2018. The comet in the picture is just another coincidence, not
related... (I think). And if it were, it's a small one, about 10m coming to a LD of 0.5. How ever what intrigues me is that there is a Blue Moon on
31.3.2018. And we all know there is some magic to earthquakes and full moons and tides.
What really bothers me is this old black pyramidian stone that is assumed to have pre-sanskrit writing on it.
The carvings or inlays show exactly the same formation and according to some sources the text predicts the coming of the Son of the Creator. I do not
know if the Pyramid is an authentic find or a hoax, and I do not know if the carved text says what it supposed to say, but it really bothers me
anyway.
The black pyramid stone overlay:
These are my thoughts for now, there are a lot more coincidences of the same kind in old sites but I'll leave it to be. I'm more than happy to hear
your thoughts. Any of them. And I'm more than happy to continue researching this possibility, even if it seems loony and in full contradict with the
consensus at the moment.
From 21/12/2012 we still have 1925 days to figure this one out.
166 320 000 seconds
2 772 000 minutes
46 200 hours
275 weeks
edit on 6-12-2012 by OnWhiteMars because: (no reason given)