It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by foodstamp
Wal Mart employees are constantly in the news because their wages are considered sub standard. However, the average associate is said to make around 11 dollars an hour (www.businessinsider.com...). The VAST MAJORITY of wal mart employees are high school and GED recipients. I don't see what entitles them to higher wages. Your comments are encouraged.
t.news.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by foodstamp
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by foodstamp
What I don't understand is why an un educated sales associate is having ANY problem with 11 an hour when I'm making only 8/hr With a college degree cause of a felony from '99.
Maybe it's because they aren't ex-criminals. Or maybe it's because they are smart enough to understand that if you commit a crime, it might have future consequences.
Originally posted by foodstamp
What I don't understand is why an un educated sales associate is having ANY problem with 11 an hour when I'm making only 8/hr With a college degree cause of a felony from '99.
Originally posted by schuyler
Wal-Mart employees do start out at low wages, but the fact is, if they work at it, they can get those wages higher. In fact, there is no reason at all why a Wal-Mart employee cannot make Manager within a few years, Store Manager in ten, and District Manager by fifteen. It's just that most lack motivation to do so.
This is true of ANY retail chain. In the smaller chains you ought to be able to make store manager within two years, district manager in five. If you don't get promoted in these situations you are either incapable of handling it intellectually, or you aren't paying attention.
The real problem here is that we don't have farm jobs for people with low IQs. Half the people have an IQ lower than 100. That doesn't qualify you for much, and it also means you are subject to replacement by robots who don't complain. China is in the process of installing 1 million robots to replace factory workers. This is just the first wave. Indeed, there is widespread speculation that manufacturing jobs will come back here--performed by robots.
People with low IQs only know how to do one thing well, and that's make babies--at a time when we need fewer babies. THAT'S why we're in trouble. Would you hire your average Wal-Mart employee? I sure would not. Hey, there are hundreds of geniuses packed in there, but finding them is tough.
Originally posted by foodstamp
Wal Mart employees are constantly in the news because their wages are considered sub standard. However, the average associate is said to make around 11 dollars an hour (www.businessinsider.com...). The VAST MAJORITY of wal mart employees are high school and GED recipients. I don't see what entitles them to higher wages. Your comments are encouraged.
t.news.msn.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
The average Walmart "associate," Wake Up Walmart reports, makes $11.75 an hour. That's $20,744 per year. Those wages are slightly below the national average for retail employees, which is $12.04 an hour. They also produce annual earnings that, in a one-earner household, are below the $22,000 poverty line.
Josue Mata, a 28-year-old employee of a south Dallas store, said he earns $8.70 an hour working full time as an overnight maintenance man. He raises four kids, pays child support and lives with his parents.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The idea that hourly rate is the only determining factor in this assessment is a perfect example of how americans fail to see the forest from the trees.
Lack of benefits, keeping hours per week below certain levels, etc, are MAIN reasons why people take issue with walmart.
11 bucks an hour isnt exactly a great wage when your employer caps you at below full-time hours so that they can avoid giving you any benefits.
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by jough626
Unions are for people with skills? So you think they deserve to be trodden on? Unions are for all people who work.
2nd.
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by boymonkey74
No. You deserve a wage that befits the level of skills and the return Im value you can provide a company. If you have no skills get some. If you have no education acquire it. We have developed a notion in this country that people should be paid according to what they want rather than what their level of skill is, or the level of skill required for the job.
McDonalds does not have to pay a fry cook the same as it pays the accountant or the guys in the IT department. The two do not provide the same valuable skill set.
Originally posted by phantomjack
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The idea that hourly rate is the only determining factor in this assessment is a perfect example of how americans fail to see the forest from the trees.
Lack of benefits, keeping hours per week below certain levels, etc, are MAIN reasons why people take issue with walmart.
11 bucks an hour isnt exactly a great wage when your employer caps you at below full-time hours so that they can avoid giving you any benefits.
I call that employer a smart business person. Heartless? Yes. Smart? Very.
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by boymonkey74
No. You deserve a wage that befits the level of skills and the return in value you can provide a company. If you have no skills get some. If you have no education acquire it. We have developed a notion in this country that people should be paid according to what they want rather than what their level of skill is, or the level of skill required for the job.
McDonalds does not have to pay a fry cook the same as it pays the accountant or the guys in the IT department. The two do not provide the same valuable skill set.edit on 24-11-2012 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)