LEAKED! The NWO Internet Takeover AND Kill Switch Agenda! If You Are Reading This - IT AFFECTS YOU!

Been checking this out off and on for awhile. The Dubai conference held next month on the third will contain proposals from various member states. Some of them have been leaked already and can be viewed here.

reply to post by cavalryscout


Because it's not about 'killing the internet'.

It's about controlling it, taxing it, charging for it, censoring it, monitoring it. By corporations no one voted for.

reply to post by Hefficide


Heff, I just wanted to let you know you did an excellent job with this thread. It's well informed, well written, and well researched! Great Job!

Star for you.

As much as I love the internet, it cannot be trusted, it has become a vast propagandist tool,

Years ago the first thing I learned about the interent was don't believe everything you read.

Kill the damn thing already maybe we would actually get off line and do something.

reply to post by khimbar


You don't think it's already controlled?

They already do all those things. I get charged for using the internet. Censorship exists. They spy on whoever they want at will. (Though some people make it much easier).

Nothing will change or if it does you won't even notice.

P.S. - I wonder how such a powerful organization "leaks" soooo much information.

reply to post by cavalryscout


Of course they do.

So imagine how much worse it is if this proposed scheme gains power.

Thanks for bringing this new info to us Heff. Just like everyone else, I've been keeping an eye on this occasionally. This seems to be another incrementalist move. Scare the crap out of everyone with Draconian maneuvers and legalism, then when they have a hissy fit, back it off to what you wanted to start with.

Our mission, should we decide to accept it, is to deny them what they wanted to start with. I'm going to share this thread with some folks, and see if we can spread the word a little. Or a lot.

reply to post by cavalryscout


Why kill the Internet? Good question - and here's an answer....

Let's say you are a government that wants to do something naughty? Like maybe open fire on a group of protesters who are making noise outside of your Federal building and making a general nuisance of themselves - and you decide "enough is enough" and you send in the riot police to bash heads and send a strong message.

Only that darned Youtube and that God awful Twitter... Yeah they cause quite the uproar when Governments do bad things.

So what to do? Oh, wait... You engage the private telecom companies in the area, bring them into the club so to speak... deputize them basically... Then all you need to do is make a phone call and ~wham~ no information gets out. You can have your way and then, later, when stuff eventually does leak? You can have your cover story and spin already planned out.

How many civil uprisings over the past several years have we ONLY gotten information about because of social media? Several.

Here's a thought. Want to know why genocide in Tibet isn't all the rage on the boards? Could it be because China already HAS this kind of control over THEIR Internet?

One of the greatest tools in a Democratic society is the flow of information.

And precedent? Want to know what the first thing the cops do during any sort of stand-off? They kill the phone lines so that the person inside cannot communicate with the outside world. This is the same concept on a larger scale.

~Heff

Originally posted by AccessDenied
" Of course you realize...this means war. " - Bugs Bunny

Ooops....got yourself onto their radar...

sec.line

reply to post by Tylerknight


Thank you for the correction. And since I'm on the podium I'd also like to thank my parents, God, the New Bedford Playhouse, Maxim magazine for their kindness, my agent, and the American public school system which left me confused about the differences between "effect" and "affect".

This award means so much.

(Sorry, since I never won an Academy Award, and you corrected my grammatical mistake - I thought I'd go ahead and seize my opportunity.)

reply to post by Stormdancer777

Kill the damn thing already maybe we would actually get off line and do something.

Says the person with over 15 thousand posts.

Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by cavalryscout

 

And precedent? Want to know what the first thing the cops do during any sort of stand-off? They kill the phone lines so that the person inside cannot communicate with the outside world. This is the same concept on a larger scale.

~Heff

Kind of seems out outdated with the use of cellphones almost everyone has one. unless they can jam a signal to the tower?

reply to post by Stormdancer777

As much as I love the internet, it cannot be trusted, it has become a vast propagandist tool,

I also want to point out something which you don't seem to have realized. Whilst the internet may be a vast wonderland of propaganda, it is also a vast wonderland of truth which exposes corruption and lies like no other medium on Earth. It's open for most of the people on Earth and allows anyone to share information. It's the number one medium for bringing together our ideas and research for the world to see. Without the internet we would be stuck with totally controlled propaganda tools: television and newspaper... *shudders*.

reply to post by Hefficide


I understand the logic and of course China, Iran, N. Korea are known censors of the internet. For the same type of censorship to occur in a country such as the U.S. or U.K. it would probably cause a civil war if not mass rioting.

Again I fail to understand why they would tamper with a system that provides so much information.

Think about the millions of morons who willingly display every aspect of their lives on Facebook and Twitter it's an easy way for the government to monitor its citizens. I know the same social websites have been used to incite violence and uprisings but if you weigh the pros and cons I bet most governments would prefer the internet remain available to the masses.

reply to post by cavalryscout

I know the same social websites have been used to incite violence and uprisings but if you weigh the pros and cons I bet most governments would prefer the internet remain available to the masses.

You have already received an answer which completely answers your question (from khimbar). It's not about killing the internet or restricting its use... it's about controlling the information flow on the internet so we don't see things they don't want us to see, exactly because it "provides so much information". As it stands the internet is the single greatest threat facing the elite puppeteers... and anyone who can't see that simple fact is completely blind.

reply to post by cavalryscout

Scary stuff.

I don't think anyone is going to kill the internet. The idea is just ludicrous.

People die. Ideas don't. But just think - what if that's the final frontier? What if, without our knowledge, they attack the freedom of consciousness? The Matrix? Big Brother? Inception?

If they develop the means, they'll think of a hundred reasons in two hours. Do we trust our leaders to leave our thoughts alone? Do we trust them to not wage war on our freedom of consciousness? Because this is just a physical expression of that idea. The exchange of information, the development of ideas, the movement of cogitation - they KNOW how dangerous our ability to communicate and brainstorm is. They KNOW how powerful we can be as intellectual revolutionaries. If given the power, do you think they won't shut us down at the very source?

If given the key, will they lock away our minds?

Originally posted by XLR8R
reply to post by Hefficide

 

I guess we'll be back to 80's, early 90's type servers to distribute info as to not be to scrutinized then. Or TOR...I gotta learn more about that.

Ah yeah, the days of BBS. I remember them well. Wait hours to log into one computer.

Originally posted by cavalryscout
reply to post by Hefficide

 

I understand the logic and of course China, Iran, N. Korea are known censors of the internet. For the same type of censorship to occur in a country such as the U.S. or U.K. it would probably cause a civil war if not mass rioting.

Again I fail to understand why they would tamper with a system that provides so much information.

Think about the millions of morons who willingly display every aspect of their lives on Facebook and Twitter it's an easy way for the government to monitor its citizens. I know the same social websites have been used to incite violence and uprisings but if you weigh the pros and cons I bet most governments would prefer the internet remain available to the masses.

I still get people asking me why I don't have a smartphone,Facebook and twitter like I'm some kind of social outcast because i don't buy into the hype of buying a 200 dollar phone that will be outdated in month and will broadcast my location to the world. My friends know I'm in my last year of school to be a information security specialist in the IT field and still haven't caught why i don't have one even when I explain it to them.

reply to post by ChaoticOrder

As it stands the internet is the single greatest threat facing the elite puppeteers... and anyone who can't see that simple fact is completely blind.

Maybe true but they can't just 'kill it'. What would people do if they couldn't access their FB account. OMG!!!!!
I wouldn't care because I don't have an account but for some it would be the end of the world.

Then what various other sites are banned? People would literally fight against such an outlandish plan.

It just seems too extreme unless the U.S. Government plans on civil war they won't do anything drastic to the internet. There may be some changes but I maintain the average person won't even notice.

These people may be evil but they aren't stupid. They have too much to lose.