It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How will American voters respond to the news?
To be fair to the White House spokesman, the truth offers far less appeal. Mr. Bush's war of choice has now forged two new enemy alliances. He has united the followers of bin Laden and Zarqawi. And, he has pushed them together with Saddam's former supporters in the Sunni triangle.
Whether he sees any of this, maybe his handlers know. It might even fulfill one of his religious fantasies, creating a clash between Christianity and Islam that so many of his supporters seem to crave. Between denying reality and never admitting mistakes, Mr. Bush has led us into the realm of self-fulfilling prophecy.
How then does the Bush campaign sell such a suicidal mission?
Vote for us ... or die! Kill them there before they kill us here.
Strange as it seem, no one really knows if the two leading figures are still alive, or where they are, or even if the elusive Zarqawi, who supposedly received medical treatment in Baghdad, has one leg or two. From the various photos of him in the world's press, he looks like several different people.
But, whether bin Laden and Zarqawi are living fugitives with $25 million rewards on their heads or dead martyrs now manipulated by others, their forces have apparently joined together in their name. How will American voters respond to the news?
So far, Team Bush has responded with caution, as if unsure whether an in-depth look at Zarqawi will help or hurt in the election campaign. White House spokesman Trent Duffy simply repeated the old refrain: "We always said there were ties between Zarqawi and al-Qaida, which underscores once again why Iraq is the central front in the war on terror."
To some, Zarqawi's present merger might suggest the opposite - that he was not working for al Qaida before, just as he was not working for Saddam when he hid out with Ansar al-Islam in remote Kurdish areas in northern Iraq, where Washington had greater control than did Baghdad. As an old speechwriter once said, never let facts stand in the way of a good story.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
But, whether bin Laden and Zarqawi are living fugitives with $25 million rewards on their heads or dead martyrs now manipulated by others, their forces have apparently joined together in their name. How will American voters respond to the news?
With that kind of money on their heads, I'd say they woulda been turned long ago. That's a lotta denero. But then again, the Iraqis do NOT trust our government and its word. They probly think they'd just be offed after turning 'em in - that is, if they even exist - and then no pay out. I can't blame them. The Bush administration has acted abomidably throughout.
Originally posted by specialasianX
The guy who led the US to Saddam didnt get # either or so i heard... the US somehow wriggled their way out of paying him. Because he was captured by US forces he wasnt entitled to the reward... of course they didnt tell him this untill after he sqealed
Originally posted by mrmulder
"You're either with us or against us" - George W. Bush
I guess he's referring to everyone on the Planet who doesn't support his Administration.
[edit on 21-10-2004 by mrmulder]
Originally posted by specialasianX
Whats your point Edsinger?
Originally posted by specialasianXHe's strayed from his war, the world has seen the war for what it is.
Originally posted by specialasianXAfghanistan was justifiable and the world backed him there and the country is fine (more or less).
Originally posted by specialasianXIraq has nothing to do with the real war on terror and the world realised this... look at the place now...
Originally posted by specialasianXThe world is turning against him but their not with the terrorists... so looks like no-one really cares about what bush said anyways coz the world see's him for what he is... a war hungry asshole
Originally posted by edsinger
I think there is a BIG difference between...Dont you?
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Originally posted by edsinger
I think there is a BIG difference between...Dont you?
Yes, your quote is a lot worse!
And can you explain to me how CSN is able to get this "INcredible information" that not even the White House can get their hands on?
[edit on 22-10-2004 by Jamuhn]
Originally posted by edsinger
Well if you post his words maybe you ought to get them correct, May I?
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.�
President Bush argued that the new war went beyond Bin Ladin. �Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there,� he said. �It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated. �The President had a message for the Pentagon: �The hour is coming when America will act, and you will make us proud.� He also had a message for those outside the United States. �This is civilization�s fight,� he said. �We ask every nation to join us.�
Thursday, September 20, 2001 G.W. Bush
That has a bit different meaning does it not?
"Over time it's going to be important for nations to know they will be held accountable for inactivity," he said. [b["You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror."
Originally posted by mrmulder
i]Originally posted by edsinger
Well if you post his words maybe you ought to get them correct, May I?
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.�
President Bush argued that the new war went beyond Bin Ladin. �Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there,� he said. �It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped, and defeated. �The President had a message for the Pentagon: �The hour is coming when America will act, and you will make us proud.� He also had a message for those outside the United States. �This is civilization�s fight,� he said. �We ask every nation to join us.�
Thursday, September 20, 2001 G.W. Bush
That has a bit different meaning does it not?
mrmulder: Not the way I see it. As I've stated earlier I sitll believe he's referring to everyone on the Planet who doesn't support his Administration. So it doesn't matter how he says it. Look here:
Originally posted by project_pisces
Yoda Speaking about and to Bush
This one a long time have I watched. All his life has he looked away... to the future, to the horizon. Never his mind on where he was. Hmm? What he was doing. Hmph. Adventure. Heh! Excitement. Heh! A Jedi craves not these things.
You are reckless!
A Jedi�s strength flows from the Force. But beware of the dark side. Anger... fear... aggression. The dark side are they. Easily they flow, (quick to join you in a fight.) If once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will, as it did Obi-Wan�s apprentice.