i'm sorry, your statistics mean nothing...
N. Korea : Undertrained Pilots
Modern Migs but not kept up mechanically
No $$$ to finance war effort for longer then a few weeks
Not enough working equipment to keep solders armed.
1974 style ICBM's that couldn't hit Russia, much less a US naval Fleet.
Oil supplies vastly overrated,
Coastal Defense Navy only
Same Tanks Iraq had
Starving People
Idiot Dictator which people will abandon once war effort turns against them.
No spy satellites, can't see US troops
Can't rely on Allies to help them out, they are on thier own.
US:
Top notch military, best training in the world
You have seen about 5% of American military might in the last 2 years.
Secret Weapons (EMP, MOAB, RAPTOR, ???, Laser Weapons)
Money to finance long term war effort'
Aid of South Korea, Japan, Austrailia, Spain, and Britain
Dominant Naval Power
Dominant Air Power
Dominant Land Power
Dominant Space Power
Dominant Technology
Logistics (Food, Clothes, Oil, Gas, Windex, you name it they got it and they can get it quick
The first two things, on the north korea list.
N. Korea : Undertrained Pilots
Modern Migs but not kept up mechanically
Pilots in the DPRKAF are trained, maybe not as much as ours, but it doesn't make them undertrained. on more than occasion they've gone into
japanese and south korean airspace not gotten shot at, nor given them a reason too, and have forced US spy planes out with their migs, which supplied
by russia and china, are maintained as well as any commercial jet liner, and are definately battle capable. not to mention the NK gets a good supply
of ah, supplies from china and russia.
Next, No $$$ to finance war effort for longer then a few weeks
Not enough working equipment to keep solders armed
money isn't a problem for the NKs. if their goal is to capture the south, the trade gained there will solve that, not to mention the economy is
geared towards war. weapons aren't a problem as north korea is, again, geared towards war, and if need be could easily become and probably is one of
the largest weapons dealers on the black and white markets.
Not enough working equipment to keep solders armed.
1974 style ICBM's that couldn't hit Russia, much less a US naval Fleet.
Um, the Tae Po Dong 2 and 3 can hit the west coast of the us and easily hit any us naval fleet in the pacific, not to mention japan south korea, and
can carry a nuclear payload.
Oil supplies vastly overrated,
Coastal Defense Navy only
Same Tanks Iraq had
how do they have an overrated oil supply? i didn't even think they had one. they don't have a navy, and won't need one to secure trade cos of the
land border with china. and the tanks, iraqi terrain is more suited to tank battle, the mountains of NK aren't so tanks wouldn't be used as much
anyway except in urban combat.
Idiot Dictator which people will abandon once war effort turns against them.
Kim Jong Il , while rash, can't be said as a dumbass. maybe maniacal and twisted, but he does have a handle on what he is doing, if not a little. not
to mention that he would die fighitng instead of run. north korean pride, in both politics and religion would prevent him from doing this, while
crazy, he still has his pride.
No spy satellites, can't see US troops
the war will be fought on land in a small country , not to mention a lot of the battle would be fought in mountainous areas where it's easy to see
invaders coming off the coast and across the dmz. there are mountains near the dmz north or seoul where you can see into the north, so this doesn't
really matter.
Can't rely on Allies to help them out, they are on thier own.
If the us does something incredibly dumb to aid taiwan in anyway, china will become an enemy really quick, china and north korea is like putting a gun
and a bullet together, it makes it work. china is the biggest ally nk has anyway, who's to say they won't decide to stand against the west now.
Top notch military, best training in the world
You have seen about 5% of American military might in the last 2 years.
Secret Weapons (EMP, MOAB, RAPTOR, ???, Laser Weapons)
Money to finance long term war effort'
Aid of South Korea, Japan, Austrailia, Spain, and Britain
Dominant Naval Power
Dominant Air Power
Dominant Land Power
Dominant Space Power
Dominant Technology
Logistics (Food, Clothes, Oil, Gas, Windex, you name it they got it and they can get it quick
Top notch military, best training in the world
but this training accounted for over half of the casualties in the war in iraq. just about half of our losses were from fratricide.
You have seen about 5% of American military might in the last 2 years
dude, we've seen about 80% of our muscle in GW2. coming from a long line of military family, even i can see this. the only reason we took them so
quickly is cos of their unwillingness to die for saddam, and our massive buildup of hundreds of thousands of troops. they had like what, 50,000 to
150,000 and we had close to 4oo,ooo soldiers over there. no contest dude.
Secret Weapons (EMP, MOAB, RAPTOR, ???, Laser Weapons)
e bombs weren't used in iraq, and north korea doesn't have any electricity hardly anyway, useless. moab, too dense of population, there'd be more
civis killed than soldiers, raptor? wtf. laser weapons, do you mean laser guided weapons? we use these anyway, as for laser cannons, hardly ready for
combat use. the ones we do have are huge, taking an entire b-52, or are on ground mounted defence stations, only a few prototype mobile lasers have
been tested for use with humvees, and in north korea, it'd be hard to put that to good use seeing as it's more for air defence now than towards star
wars style laser tossing.
Money to finance long term war effort'
Aid of South Korea, Japan, Austrailia, Spain, and Britain
money isn't the problem, it's the thought of would the people support a war that long? south korea, if it acts, the north can nuke it, give it a
disease, or a nerve gas. they are immobilized. japan can launch a fight, but can be hit by the same stuff the north can. australia will help as much
as they did in iraq, maybe less, they trained in an iraq like environment, not a north korea like environment. spain, they can help us too,
politically, they didn't have many soldiers in iraq. britain will remain our lap dog through almost nay conflict, as long as blair stays in office
that is.
Dominant Naval Power
Dominant Air Power
Dominant Land Power
Dominant Space Power
Dominant Technology
Air Power, look at the uss cole bombing. it's only cos the rest of the world has no navy.
Air Power, greatre than north korea, but not without losses. not to mention an inability to launch. a few pacific island bases like guam and hawaii
and japan/south korea, limiting our ability to strike for prolonged periods. not to mention this time around, north korea has a deployable air force.
iraq didn't
Land Power, north korea would probably end up the same as Vietnam , except with bio/chem weapons and nukes, NK wouldn't hesitate to toast seoul.
don't fool yourselves into beliveing we'd be perfect in urban combat either.
Space Power, doesn't make a large difference for anymore than sight as of yet.
Technology. look to iraq, our technology works against us. hell, even here on fort drum, this year alone there have been four black hawk crashes.
think about in wartime. it'll be worse. not to mention it's the knowledge of how to use that technology. american soldiers don't aim, they spray in
the general direction. they get lucky a lot by enemy soldiers being lined up, when that happens grenades and missles and stuff get them. so we pick
off the little ones. technological advantages depends on the eye of the beholder.
Logistics (Food, Clothes, Oil, Gas, Windex, you name it they got it and they can get it quick
Food, in iraq we were down to two MREs a day at times. Oil, no doubt we're the king, but in a hundred years it won't matter. gas, same as oil.
windex, wtf? anyway, our supplies wouldn't be as close to us as in iraq, they'd have to be shipped, that takes a long time across the pacific. it
took us three months in iraq, and even then we used a lot.
here's what i see.
a war with north korea should be avoided. we'd come out victorious no doubt, but merely the north korean capacity to kill is unprecedented in any
wartime foe we've faced since hitler. even one warhead full of chemical weapons would kill thousands in seoul, the capitol of SK in range of many NK
missles. the ground war would no doubt be a vietnam type affair, and with hundreds of artillary pieces aimed at the South from the other side of the
DMZ alone, the opening hours would see hundreds of thousands of deaths. not to mention the nk tunnels under the dmz. it's all very bad. very bad.
i hope my analysis of your analysis of both sides doesn't anger you, i'm just highlighting what could go wrong for each, and examples of where some
cases have happened. i agree we'd win, but i'm learning to argue a point that is wrong to make it right. it's not easy.