It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by curiouscanadian777
I made that comment because when you say k-8, it sounds like they are getting this all through elementary. It's one grade they're getting this.
You're saying you don't want your 8th grader learning this, I'm saying I'm fine with my 8th grader learning it.
You say it has no educational merit, I'm saying it does.
Again, it is not about what *I* think, it is about convincing the majority of parents, teachers and whoever else that it needs to be removed from the curriculum.
If you want to make that your crusade, as Unity does, more power to you.
Originally posted by curiouscanadian777
Okay, fair enough.
Educational merit...
You've all ready said yourself you felt it had educational merit, just that it is not appropriate at grade 8 level.
That is your opinion. You can say this is over kids' that ages heads, but that is subjective. I was watching the news and encouraged to by grade 4. I personally think it has tremendous educational value in knowing the what and why, and also context for the present.
We are talking about one unit on world religions in a social studies book.
Wherein they are talking about what other people believe, not what to believe.
Social Studies is defined as "a part of a school or college curriculum concerned with the study of social relationships and the functioning of society."
Religion plays a huge part in "the functioning of society and social relationships", both in the past and in the present.
They are teaching a general overview of each religion and then testing them on what they've learned.
Again, what others believe not what to believe.
This would then, I assume, be built on in the other units of the book, giving context to what is covered later.
I don't have a problem with this.
Again, it is not about what you or I believe, but what the majority of parents are going to agree on. You are saying you couldn't care less what Canadian kids are taught, but that you do think it should be removed from the curriculum?!
I have to go now, but listen, there are many many posts in this thread that answer your questions far better than I have. (I've never claimed to be a talented debater )
edit on 2-11-2012 by curiouscanadian777 because: add comment
The study of history, geography, civics, sociology, economics, and other social science subjects, especially in primary and secondary schools
The traditional focuses of sociology have included social stratification, social class, culture, social mobility, religion, secularization, law, and deviance. As all spheres of human activity are affected by the interplay between social structure and individual agency, sociology has gradually expanded its focus to further subjects, such as health, medical, military and penal institutions, the Internet, and the role of social activity in the development of scientific knowledge.
[
Social Studies is generally to teach "Social Order" throughout history. This is more about Classes in terms of wealth and ability, like Nobles vs Peasants. When I was in social studies [I'm only 26, so not as long ago as many others] we learned about Hierarchy, kings & queens, knights and nobility. Mostly medieval times things to teach Society Structures of the past as a ground work to learning how we got to be how we are today.
Not to teach how society works. Or the intricacies of diverse society. That's college grade stuff for sure.edit on 2-11-2012 by Laykilla because: (no reason given)