It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NthOther
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
All I'm saying is that's not what the guy said. Go back and look at the quote. You're interpreting his statement as a blanket condemnation of science in an attempt to make Republicans look stupid.
I'm not Republican, Democrat, nor anything of the sort--they're all stupid. I'm simply pointing out the manipulative use of language.
Originally posted by Alxandro
I don't agree with this guy but I do know where hes coming from.
Science, whether literally or symbolically, was introduced to man kind to deter away from God.
Originally posted by Alxandro
I don't agree with this guy but I do know where hes coming from.
Science, whether literally or symbolically, was introduced to man kind to deter away from God.
Case in point, the serpent introduced Adam and Eve to the Tree of Knowledge, and claimed that by eating its fruit they will become like God.
So one can say that the Tree of Knowledge symbolizes science because now man is on the verge of becoming God-like, and not too far away from creating his own mini universes and small life-forms, if he hasn't already.
Originally posted by Alxandro
So one can say that the Tree of Knowledge symbolizes science because now man is on the verge of becoming God-like, and not too far away from creating his own mini universes and small life-forms, if he hasn't already.
Originally posted by Alxandro
I don't agree with this guy but I do know where hes coming from.
Science, whether literally or symbolically, was introduced to man kind to deter away from God.
Case in point, the serpent introduced Adam and Eve to the Tree of Knowledge, and claimed that by eating its fruit they will become like God.
So one can say that the Tree of Knowledge symbolizes science because now man is on the verge of becoming God-like, and not too far away from creating his own mini universes and small life-forms, if he hasn't already.
It all comes full circle 6000 years from now (our time) when these same, small universes will be relatively about 2 Billion years old (their time) and will no longer believe in Man as their creator.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
. . .
Science doesn't disprove god...it just says that there is no objective evidence for his/her/its existence...which is a FACT.
Science gave us longer life spans, food for billions of people, cures diseases, makes it possible for you to type posts on the Internet (no matter how wrong those posts are), allows you to drive cars, fly planes, use a microwave...and and and and...
Not once did scientists go "mhhhhh, my real goal is to disprove god...that microwave's just a bi-product"
What you consider science disproving god is nothing but FACTS disagreeing with your religious beliefs
Sure science has given us longer life spans, but for all we know it is merely allowing the human body to revert back to biblical days when people lived to be over one hundred years old.
In other words, it is allowing man to re-enable what was intentionally disabled by God so many years ago, when man ate from the tree, which eventually led to mortality with each generation living less than the last.
Re-discoveries because many times they focus on foods mentioned in the Bible.
You know, the natural stuff without all the cancerous artificial preserves and all the Monsanto bi-products.