It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In yet another example of the blurring of the lines between civilian police and US military forces, Columbia, South Carolina police “officials” have announced that US Military Police from Ft. Jackson will be on the streets alongside civilian law enforcement after the South Carolina-Georgia football game this Saturday night, October 6.
The plan will involve barricades, surveillance cameras, DUI checkpoints, and even observation towers “to keep the crowd under control.”
In the last few years we have seen US Military troops deployed all over the country for the purpose of assisting domestic law enforcement. For instance, U.S. Army personnel were deployed to the streets of Samson, Alabama in 2009 for the purposes of aiding the local police in patrols after a gunman left 10 people dead.
Even more common, the US Military has been involved in aiding local and state law enforcement conducting roadblocks for some time, even, as was the case in Tennessee, amidst the objections of some state officials.
In Virginia, the National Guard has been involved in conducting “wellness checks” as well as patrolling downtown city locations and residential neighborhoods.
Clearly, the American people are being conditioned to accept the US Military as a domestic police force by the slow acclimation process of introducing military presence in a variety of different circumstances.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Oh this is B.S. and both parties in Congress need to raise a hand and say NO. They don't have the power to order Military forces to stand down but they can absolutely make everyone in command pay later for Constitutional indiscretions. Now National Guard can be a real fuzzy area and true national disasters are blurry. One of the best books written about Hurricane Andrew that I recall reading was by an NCO with the 10th Mountain Division sent to help on the streets.
This though??? What meaning does Posse Comitatus have if the Federal Troops are going to be out on traffic control and observation tower duty at 100% civilian events? I mean lets shred it then...but I've about had it with this Administration playing like the laws simply don't exist at all. They DO....and I can't see how THIS isn't VERY far outside it.
Just because the law's been broken more and more frequently, as they note, doesn't make each incident any less a problem either. Arg.... What's next? Troops to help local law enforcement in every major city? Chicago? LA? Where is the line anymore and more importantly, does ANYONE actually know now?edit on 5-10-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
I keep asking this question in other threads and always receive the same answers: "This is America. It'll never happen here"...or the one that really sticks out "It's for our safety and I feel better knowing I'll be protected"
BS.
Anyone still doubting the Military encroachment into America is not happening is either deaf, dumb or blind to their surroundings.
Originally posted by freedomSlave
Would it not be cheaper for having the military also do role of the police they do want to do cut backs
Originally posted by jude11
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Notice how many people are responding to this violation of American freedoms and rights thread Wrabbit2000?
I guess that answers your question as to where the line is.
Peace
Originally posted by jude11
Originally posted by freedomSlave
Would it not be cheaper for having the military also do role of the police they do want to do cut backs
And there it is...
Yup, save a few bucks and lose a thousand rights.
Are you serious? Please tell me you're being sarcastic...
edit on 5-10-2012 by jude11 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by freedomSlave
reply to post by jude11
Both to be honest ,I don't really like seeing military personnel riding around my city where I live with their suv's and gun turret mounted on the tops I find it rather in bad taste .
How ever the logic in me asks well why pay for two separate entities of law enforcement ( local and international) Why two sets of a lot of the same thing the military already have to local law enforcement .edit on 5/10/12 by freedomSlave because: (no reason given)
do we really need two sets of drones for both teamsedit on 5/10/12 by freedomSlave because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ColCurious
reply to post by jude11
Well, at least this will end the horrorstories of U.S. policemen killing civilians.
I know I'm tired of reading those and you Americans should be pretty used to them by now.
A little military law enforcement can only make things better and improve the situation, right?
Besides, what are you going to do with your massive amount of military personnel anyways?edit on 5-10-2012 by ColCurious because: (no reason given)