It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
source
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Friday's monthly jobs report changed the picture of the U.S. economy in more ways than one, showing the unemployment rate fell to the lowest level in more than three years and hiring was stronger than originally reported throughout the summer.
Unemployment unexpectedly fell to 7.8% in September, down from 8.1%, as a survey of U.S. households showed 873,000 more Americans had jobs compared to a month earlier.
The last time the unemployment rate was that low was in January 2009, the month President Obama was inaugurated.
A separate survey of employers, considered the key metric that Wall Street watches, showed businesses added 114,000 jobs in September. It marked a slowdown in hiring, after July and August were revised significantly higher.
Those revisions added 86,000 more jobs than originally reported in the summer.
Ever since the financial crisis, the monthly jobs report has been the most intensely watched economic indicator, but in election season, attention surrounding the numbers has reached new heights.
Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by TheGreatDivider
Is this the same scale Bush used?edit on 5-10-2012 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by TheGreatDivider
Is this the same scale Bush used?edit on 5-10-2012 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)
The graph in the linked article says probably so.
Unless they have changed to methods ?
What do you think ?
This graph has a different perspective....
September jobs report: Unemployment rate tumbles
Originally posted by modified device
you expect me to believe that 114,000 jobs created in September was enough to bring the jobless rate from 8.1 to 7.8?
This is rather amusing; +114,000 is fewer than the working-age population growth in the household survey (206,000) and yet unemployment decreased. Huh? The household survey's unadjusted numbers, however, show some rather interesting figures, none of which make sense. "Not in labor force" increased by 386,000 while "employed" increased by 775,000 a net change off "unemployed and looking" of well north of a million people! But -- giving up is not the same thing as finding a job.
Originally posted by xuenchen
reply to post by buster2010
No No !!
It is all Obama's fault.
He and his Hemocrat Congress did it.
The Hems had control of Congress from Jan 2007 until Jan 2011.
It's their fault.
And most of the fiscal 2009 budget and spending was instigated by Obama & Co.
We have gone over all that before.
We know you know that.
Beside, they failed to fix things in 4 years.