Thanks all for taking the time to stop by. I am an obama supporter, hough I would love to see a revamping of the entire republican and democratic
system to get more laws past for the good of the country. The tug of war is plain and simply awful for the country.
People like Jesse Ventura and Ron Paul would be less prone to be bought out by big money lobbyist. Though not perfect, it would be a step in the
right direction. But it would have to be such that both democratic and republicans would have to quite stalling in their agreements to work together
for the sake of the country. Unless a revamping of both parties, a new party wouldn't get much done either.
An example of this is:
The last debate, Romney talks of how great he is in dealing across the board with the democrats. And I think Obama could of filled volumes with how
tough it is getting his ideas past to the Republicans. This predicament seems to happen way too often in presidencies down throughout past decades
with both parties.
The Wiki on President Obama:
en.wikipedia.org...
As president, Obama signed economic stimulus legislation in the form of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and the Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 in response to the 2007–2009 recession in the United States. Other major
domestic policy initiatives include the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010, and the Budget Control Act of 2011. In foreign policy, Obama ended US military involvement in the Iraq
War, increased troop levels in Afghanistan, signed the New START arms control treaty with Russia, ordered U.S. military involvement in Libya, and
ordered the military operation that resulted in the death of Osama bin Laden.
Wiki on Romney:
en.wikipedia.org...
Elected Governor of Massachusetts in 2002, Romney did not seek re-election in 2006. During his term, he presided over the elimination of a projected
$3 billion deficit through a combination of spending cuts, increased fees, and removal of corporate tax loopholes; Massachusetts also benefited from
new federal grants and unexpected revenue from a previously enacted capital gains tax increase. He helped develop and signed into law the
Massachusetts health care reform legislation, the first of its kind in the nation, which provided near-universal health insurance access through
state-level subsidies and individual mandates to purchase insurance. Romney ran for the Republican nomination in the 2008 U.S. presidential election,
winning several primaries and caucuses but losing the nomination to John McCain. In June 2011, he announced that he would seek the 2012 Republican
presidential nomination.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ QUESTION:
I never studied why Romney lost to John McCain because I followed Obama.
Why did Romney loose to McCain ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After adding the question above, I am trying to do more searches:
You would think that because of McCains view of war mongering, why Romney would of lost out to
McCain. Was Romney that bad:
Here is a post from a reader from latimes:
www.latimes.com...
baieli at 12:39 PM October 01, 2012
Although Romney's views is going to cause him to lose the election. John McCain himself is going to be a major reason too that Romney is going to lose
the election. McCain is running around the country complaining and calling for wars, bombings, and invasions! McCain himself is a warmonger but
except for the Defense Industry and the *(Oil companies) that own McCain most people do not want McCain's wars. We don't want Romney & McCain sending
our children and grandchildren off to some war for senseless killings and bloodshed. Romney too could appoint McCain Sec of Defense and nobody would
want to see that warmonger John McCain in the office. Anyways at McCain's advance age McCain lacks the skills, knowledge, profieniecy and temperament
and qualifications to understand today's MODERN problems.
I put the *( ) for oil companies.
No, I am not that stupid to think that rich oil republicans can't have a tremendous effect on the presidential race.
Here is another reason I think big money can effect the outcome of elections, check this out about Mitt:
From LJP305:
Read this and look what powers the rich have! You think OIL COMPANIES can't do the same thing?
RE Mitt, China & taxes:
The Boston Globe reports that as Bain Capital CEO, Mitt invested in Global-Tech Appliances, a China based manufacturing company. In an Apr 8, 1998
prospectus meant to attract investors, Global-Tech said it used inexpensive labor and highlighted working conditions of it's metal stamping
department:
Peak Production Periods require six-day work weeks, and 10-hour shifts per day.
The main manufacturing facility, located in Dongguan China, includes 14 buildings that serve as dormitories accommodating up to 3,700 workers.
The Institute for Global Labour and Human Rights said that Global-Tech's workers earn “…just 24 cents an hour in 1998 and less than $2.00 a day.
Wages in Global-Tech were less than 2% of US wages.”
Shortly before Mitt invested, Global-Tech promoted its low-wage, low-tax liability to investors saying its current operations would not be subject to
“material US taxes because it should not be considered to have significant income effectively with a trade or business in the US.”
Nine days later on Apr 17, 1998, Bain Capital affiliate Brookside Capital Partners Fund acquired about 6% of Global-Tech according to the Securities
and Exchange Commission. Mitt was listed as the sole shareholder, sole director, President & CEO of Brookside, Inc. This was 1 of many examples of
Mitt choosing to pay less US taxes while using/exploiting foreign workers for profit.
edit on 5-10-2012 by thetiler because: added
thought