It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kryties
If the evidence were in Italy and she feared for her safety in returning to get it then it would be reasonable to assume she was incapable of providing evidence for other reasons than just that she didn't have any.
Originally posted by Kryties
Man, woman - doesn't matter. I have pointed this out 3 times already and am starting to get a little annoyed that you seem to be completely ignoring that fact. Are you ignoring this deliberately? Or are you just incapable of reading properly?
Originally posted by Kryties
But, by all means, ignore all this and try to claim I am being sexist again - kgo.
Originally posted by ladyteeny
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Sublimecraft
Although I agree that the law is the law, this, like many other instances is upsetting because the girls are the ones copping the brunt of their parents inability to resolve their differences and hence be separated.
Once again the children suffer the most
While the mother's selfishness is understandable, she has put her own interests before that of her children.
in view of his apparent aggression i'd say she's putting the interests of her children first. and given they are all old enough to be consulted in the matter i think this is a disgusting state of affairs.
Originally posted by ollncasino
The father has actually been gracious enough to agree to not lay criminal charges, if the mother returns to Italy to contest child custody
Originally posted by antonia
Gracious? You certainly are very trusting of someone you don't know. I don't what is going on here, except to say you seem to the think the mother is the only one manipulating this. Don't be silly, He is too and he's got his reasons for wanting charges pressed. They may not be what you think.
Originally posted by antonia
Then let him, my point is you seem to be rather trusting of someone you don't know yet you ding those who support the mother. You are no different.
Originally posted by ollncasino
You appear to rather trusting of a women who has made scurrilous allegations she is unable to prove yet you 'ding', as you put it, those who support the wronged father who has suffered two years of mental and financial strain fighting through a foreign legal system to merely get his kids back.
Originally posted by antonia
I have made no statement of support or condemnation of either party. I am simply stating you are doing excatly what you chide other in this thread for doing.
Originally posted by infowarrior9970
I think the reactions of the girls SPEAKS louder than words.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
reply to post by ollncasino
Hang on...
The mother ran and took her kids to protect them, after all, they were "in hiding" with their Grandmother.
And that brings up something else, obviously the mother and Grandmother are in Australia.
The judge even says that he DOESN'T TRUST the father, and believes that he has lied. But he still sent the kids home to him, against their will!
This is a messed up situation, but based on all of that, I would be ruling that the kids stay with their mother. I don't care if you think the kids are too young to decide, at 9 an up I don't believe they are too young. They can be asked, and they can give an answer. They obviously wanted to stay with their mother, and IMO that should be the end of the story.