It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FishMonkey
However , i fail to understand why anyone would think that this is an actual uprising, revolution, rebellion (whatever you want to call it) since the organization of these "rebels" strikes a remarkable resemblance to that of the "Free Libyian Army" . And we all know how that ended - with the AL-QAEDA flag flying high.
Originally posted by FishMonkey
And you believe this because they said it ?
Originally posted by FishMonkey
Gaddafi was bullied out of position by America , France , and Britain - they are now using the same tactics in Sryia.
Originally posted by FishMonkey
Let me ask you , if these people are being crushed by a regime and live in absolute poverty because of this regime .... how could they all afford weapons ?
Originally posted by FishMonkey
And if Britain is sending aid such as "walkie talkies" to Syria as they did with Libya , who is delivering them ?
Originally posted by Soshh
Apparently sourced from an article published online by the German-language service of Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting citing a Die Welt article which doesn't exist. The IRIB article has now been deleted.
Originally posted by FishMonkey
reply to post by stumason
And you believe this because they said it ?
Gaddafi was bullied out of position by America , France , and Britain - they are now using the same tactics in Sryia.
Let me ask you , if these people are being crushed by a regime and live in absolute poverty because of this regime .... how could they all afford weapons ?
And if Britain is sending aid such as "walkie talkies" to Syria as they did with Libya , who is delivering them ?
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Soshh
Apparently sourced from an article published online by the German-language service of Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting citing a Die Welt article which doesn't exist. The IRIB article has now been deleted.
Those Georgetown University Washington International law professors are obviously not to be trusted.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Those Georgetown University Washington International law professors are not to be trusted?
While the 95% is perhaps an exaggeration
Originally posted by ollncasino
Those Georgetown University Washington International law professors are not to be trusted?
Originally posted by Soshh
Is that a serious question? Would I trust a clown paid by Russia Today to discuss a nonexistent report?
Originally posted by Soshh
Out of interest, how much of an effort did you make to verify this before you posted it? It took me about 4 minutes.