It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Editor’s Note: This analysis the second in a five-part series on Democrats’ mythical sound bites by Andrew Puzder, an economic adviser to Mitt Romney and CEO of CKE Restaurants, which employs about 21,000 workers. The first installment was entitled, “Democratic Myth No. 1: GOP Is to Blame for Failure of Obama’s Job Policies.”
President Obama has repeatedly attempted to frame the debate over increasing federal revenue and reducing the deficit as a simple matter: Just raise taxes on people who have been successful. To use the President’s precise phrasing: “All I’m saying is that those who have done well, including me, should pay their fair share in taxes.”
This sound bite sounds so good that one is tempted to simply agree without ever questioning the president’s underlying assumption that the successful among us are not already paying their fair share. Or, that increasing tax rates on the successful is the same as increasing tax revenues. Neither assumption reflects reality. As is the case with every Democratic sound bite, the president is counting on it being so appealing that most Americans will accept what he says rather than see it for the myth that it is. In fact, he is counting on people believing the myth even when faced with facts to the contrary......
Democratic Myth No. 2: Those who have done well should pay their fair share
Higher income, greater tax burden
So, what is the reality? We currently have a progressive tax system where those with more income pay a greater share of their income in taxes. In 2009 (the most recent year for which we have such data), the top 1 percent of taxpayers (those earning over $344,000) earned 17 percent of adjusted gross income but paid 37 percent of all federal income taxes, more than twice their share of national income. That seems very unfair to the 1 percent and like a very good deal for the other 99 percent.
The top 5 percent (those earning over $155,000) earned 32 percent of adjusted gross income but paid 59 percent of all federal income taxes. In other words, the top 5 percent paid more in income taxes than the remaining 95 percent combined. Again, hardly unfair to the other 95 percent. The top 10 percent (those earning over $112,000) earned 43 percent of adjusted gross income but paid 71 percent of all federal income taxes. On the other hand, the bottom 50 percent earned 13.5 percent of adjusted gross income and paid 2.5 percent of all federal income taxes.
While much depends on your definition of “fair,” the wealthy already pay substantially more than their proportional share of taxes and perhaps more than many would objectively consider their “fair share.” Why President Obama feels that “those who have done well” are failing to pay their fair share is, shall we say, unclear.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Apparently "The Rich" in fact do pay the majority of taxes.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by xuenchen
It’s been stated many times that even if the fed took 100% of the income of everyone earning over $1million per year it would only float the spending for a matter of days and would do nothing to solve the federal debt.
We don’t have a tax problem….we have a spending problem. This topic is simply being used (as it always has) for political gain.
S&F
Originally posted by neo96
There are a lot of Democratic myths.
Those who get the most benefits from tax revenue pay the least in see SS,Medicare,Medcaid.
Now some people find it totally logically to make those who aren't using those programs or even need them to pay for those who are.
For a group of people who scream civil rights all day long when it comes to a certain group who isnt LGBT the well to do have no rights.
The Democrats always try to have it both ways considering all those millionaire,and billionaires in their party.
Sick and freaking tired of this fair share crap when 47% is not paying their fair share.
Last thought.www.politico.com... read it and weep.
Every needs a dog in that hunt instead of nickle and diming a minority to extinction.edit on 1-10-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
We do have a tax problem.
The budget was working until Bush gave unfunded tax cuts and started two new wars, without
accounting for both in the budget.
You are using it for political gain.
reply to post by Hefficide
That's the analog and that's why so many are enraged right now. If the ship is sinking, you don't pick the weak ones to start bailing - you start with the strongest as your core of labor and then let the weaker folks pitch in as they can. As they are able.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by campanionator
We do have a tax problem.
The budget was working until Bush gave unfunded tax cuts and started two new wars, without
accounting for both in the budget.
You are using it for political gain.
I beg your pardon.
The top 10% of wage earners pay 71% of all the taxes collected…..we already have a progressive tax system. If the idiots in DC would make a realistic budget and stop spending so much we’d have a huge surplus right now.
We have a spending problem.