Originally posted by Sargon of Agade
OK, but how do you define poverty? The census lists it at a certain income level which is not a good reflection on lifestyle. If you have a million
dollars in the bank collecting 1% interest, according to the census Bureau, you are living in poverty. (Only $10K in income)
And that happens how often in the real world?
Tell me how many children were hungry because no adult was able to feed them after their income and available Government assistance. BTW, one
of those "questions" asked to come up with those stats was something akin to , 'In the past year has your child ever complained about hunger?'
News flash! I hear 'Daddy, I'm hungry, when are we going to eat?' almost daily. Complaining about hunger?
Go back and actually read the definitions in the Current Population Survey; the food security module is a joint effort between the USDA and the Census
Bureau.
"Households that are classified as hungry are those in which adults have decreased the quality and quantity of food they consume because of lack of
money to the point where they are quite likely to be hungry on a frequent basis, or in which children's intake has been reduced due to lack of family
financial resources, to the point that children are likely to be hungry on a regular basis and adults' food intake is severely reduced.
"Even when hunger is not present, adults in households determined to be food insecure by the survey are so limited in resources to buy food that they
are running out of food, or reducing the quality of food their family eats, or feeding their children unbalanced diets, or skipping meals so their
children can eat, in order to adjust to the economic problems that threaten the adequacy of their family's diet."
They're not talking about needing a snack before dinner.
Programs like Food Stamps and WIC provide plenty of money for basic sustanence.... I won't even get into school lunches/breakfasts/food banks
and the lot.
Oh, let's do. The "Status Report on Hunger and Homelessness in America's Cities" put out by the United States Conference of Mayors in 2002
states:
"Officials in the [25] survey cities estimate that during the past year requests for emergency food assistance increased by an average of 19 percent,
with 100 percent of the cities registering an increase. Requests for food assistance by families with children increased by an average of 17 percent.
Requests for emergency food assistance by elderly persons increased by an average 19 percent during the last year, with 92 percent of the cities
reporting an increase.
"On average, 16 percent of the requests for emergency food assistance are estimated to have gone unmet during the last year. For families alone, 14
percent of the requests for assistance are estimated to have gone unmet. In 32 percent of the cities, emergency food assistance facilities may have to
turn away people in need due to lack of resources.
"Forty-eight percent of the people requesting emergency food assistance were members of families -- children and their parents. Thirty-eight percent
of the adults requesting food assistance were employed.
"In 64 percent of the cities emergency food assistance facilities have had to decrease the number of bags of food provided and/or the number of times
people can receive food....
"During the past year requests for emergency shelter increased in the survey cities by an average of 19 percent.... Requests for shelter by homeless
families alone increased by 20 percent, with 88 percent of the cities reporting an increase.
"An average of ...38 percent of the requests by homeless families ... are estimated to have gone unmet during the last year. In 60 percent of the
cities, emergency shelters may have to turn away homeless families due to lack of resources....
"Requests for assisted housing by low-income families and individuals increased in 88 percent of the cities during the last year. Thirty-one percent
of eligible low-income households are currently served by assisted housing programs. City officials estimate that low-income households spend an
average of 49 percent of their income on housing.
"Applicants must wait an average of 19 months for public housing in the survey cities. The wait for Section 8 Certificates is 21 months, for Section
8 Vouchers, 23 months. Forty-eight percent of the cities have stopped accepting applications for at least one assisted housing program due to the
excessive length of the waiting list."
Local govt.'s are barely treading water with regard to these problems. At what point do you think this should become a federal priority?
Show me a power company that will turn off Granny's heat in the winter and I'll show you a 'Live 5 News Report.' It won't happen if
Granny just asks for some help.
One of those mythical power companies is Georgia Natural Gas. Back in the winter of 2000-'01 GNG threatened as many as 190,000 customers with shutoff
due to nonpayment. The Georgia Public Service Commission had to step in and issue a moratorium on shutoffs because of record high winter heating bills
and billing problems caused by deregulation. When all was said and done, GNG was found guilty by the PSC of improperly and illegally disconnecting
service to almost 1200 customers. This stuff *does happen.* And please don't reply with "they should've applied to LIHEAP." In 2001, LIHEAP
received a total of $2.25 billion...enough to serve only 17% of eligible households.
This topic is on Poverty in the US..I know it's worse in the socialist paradises of Western Europe. (and will get even worse as their
population ages) Stay on topic.
So you're saying that poverty affects people differently according to their proximity to the Greenwich Meridian? Must've missed that memo....
If it makes you feel better, Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health--located right here in the good ol' U.S. of A--has said that
"Living in low-income families—families with incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level—the amount that research suggests is
needed for most families to be economically self-sufficient—exacts a measurable toll on children’s overall healthy development. The
intellectual, social-emotional, and physical development of children in low-income families have been shown to lag behind that of their more affluent
peers."
The Federal Government is charged with "Providing for the Common Defense," the vast majority for Education and Social Welfare is handled at
the State and local levels.
See the above-referenced United States Conference of Mayors report; this problem is too big to be "handled at the State and local levels."
The national budget is consumed by DoD spending not DoE.
Again, we need to reevaluate our priorities as a nation. The Pentagon's budget is more than 5 times greater than that of the next greatest spender,
which happens to be Russia (which was an ally, last time I checked). Exactly how much defending do we need?
sources:
www.usmayors.org...
www.nccp.org...
www.macontelegraph.com...
www.acorn.org...