It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives brings fewer than a hundred alcohol and tobacco cases a year. It now plays second fiddle to the Federal Bureau of Investigation on explosives. And its skill at catching firearms violators is in doubt after the flawed probe known as Fast and Furious.
No wonder the agency's boss is looking to reinvent it, and maybe even change its name
The ATF is a Washington oddity, stitched together in the 1970s from units going back to the age of Prohibition. Gun-rights supporters are wary of it, yet they are also loath to see firearms regulation move to the FBI.
So the ATF survives, and acting director B. Todd Jones has to figure out what to do with it. "We're the entity that everyone loves to hate," said the 55-year-old former Marine.
Hence an idea discussed by top ATF officials: ditching the agency's anachronistic seven-word name and rebranding it the Violent Crime Bureau
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by neo96
I say that your perspective on this is so biased, .....
Originally posted by g146541
reply to post by neo96
It is not uncommon for an amusement park to rename a roller coaster after it has crashed and killed some people.
It is also not uncommon for a corporation to change its name after its policy has gotten some folks killed.
Welcome to the corporate states of America!
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by g146541
reply to post by neo96
It is not uncommon for an amusement park to rename a roller coaster after it has crashed and killed some people.
It is also not uncommon for a corporation to change its name after its policy has gotten some folks killed.
Welcome to the corporate states of America!
It's not just corporations.
Didn't ACORN change its name so it could still receive government funds?
Originally posted by eazyriderl_l
reply to post by g146541
Not to nit pick but how do alcohol, tobacco or firearms discriminate between them? Its the safe practice of these things that discriminates. Why is tobacco on this list again?
Originally posted by beezzer
Instead of re-inventing itself and justifying its existence, why not close it down?
Save money.
Spend less on redudant government agencies.
Of course that is common sense, so I'd like to apologise for even bringing it up.