It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Annee
Have you ever made a bad joke? Said something with no malice that was blown out of proportion? The cops attempted to remove him calmly and he wouldnt go.
That is a very lame excuse for a man who is in the position to represent all Americans.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by shells4u
reply to post by Annee
yes I too used to vote Rep. but switched to Dem. in the 1980's and have never regretted it...
I'm still not Dem.
I am registered unaffiliated.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by spacejosh
Ryan showed his cards on this one.his reaction was degrading and disrespectful
I think that is the major point here.
Ryan was only made official Saturday. It only took him 1 day to show his true colors.
Originally posted by Carseller4
Democrat operative putting on a show.
I'd be upset also if I was 71 years old and having to rely on government.
What a wasted life.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by pointr97
No, you missed the point, Ryan should have stood up for the man's right to tell a candidate what he thought. Ryan, as a candidate and elected official, should WANTED to hear what the man was obviously frustrated about.....However, his slap stick off handed comment showed he didn't know how to respond, and more importantly, a lack of concern for what the voters think.
Statesmen have turned into politicians, and when people say, 'they are just being political, they are just being political'....how many times have you heard that 'politics' used as a negative term, it is a negative term but the people who use it most are politicians. We need statesmen, we need people elected by the voting body that REPRESENT the body and act in their favor.....not these half wits with cute faces that come from money who don't care about anyone besides their own well being and their agenda.
Kudos to this old man for retorting what Paul was saying, can't believe he allowed the cops to debate the point the man was making by just removing the issue, not actually addressing it.
Bingo!
Regardless, this man SHOULD have been allowed to speak ! Politicians work for US, not the other way around. Too many times, the little voice isn't heard, among the sea of Partisan voices. He obviously, has seen this happen, and was going to use his moment. Ryan, should have said, hold on, I will let you speak. He didn't. He should have told the Police, to hold on also. He could have, and should have, if he respects ALL the voices, he represents.
Originally posted by Domo1
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Annee
Have you ever made a bad joke? Said something with no malice that was blown out of proportion? The cops attempted to remove him calmly and he wouldnt go.
That is a very lame excuse for a man who is in the position to represent all Americans.
Youre right Annee politicians should be perfect all the time. This is being blown out of proportion because you dont like Ryan. Surely Biden and Obama have never gaffed.
right and he should show them zee paperz zee paperz.why should he be removed what gives one man the right to speak, without a rebuttal?news reports and press conferences, are not an exclusive alternate realities, just because there are mics and cameras rolling is in no way license to censor free speech. we should be free to speak to who we want to, where we want to, when we want to, politicians are just people we have been conditioned to think they are on some pedestal. but, they are no better than you or I and, have no more right to censor speech than you or I do.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by elitegamer23
Does that make it OK for this guy? I felt the same way I do about this. He should have been removed.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by acidsweep
This happened a year ago.
Originally posted by elitegamer23
Originally posted by Carseller4
Democrat operative putting on a show.
I'd be upset also if I was 71 years old and having to rely on government.
What a wasted life.
this man was forced to pay social security for 50 years. what are you getting at, he shouldnt get any of that money back?
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by acidsweep
This happened a year ago.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by acidsweep
This happened a year ago.
Originally posted by Carseller4
Originally posted by elitegamer23
Originally posted by Carseller4
Democrat operative putting on a show.
I'd be upset also if I was 71 years old and having to rely on government.
What a wasted life.
this man was forced to pay social security for 50 years. what are you getting at, he shouldnt get any of that money back?
Thanks for pointing out the MAIN problem!!!!
Government confiscation of hard earned money without consent is the whole problem.
I never agreed to hand over money to the government for retirement, when I can handle that much better than government can. What if I wanted to retire at 50? You think the government will distribute that money back to me at that time? After all it is my money, "shouldn't I get any of that back"?edit on 12-8-2012 by Carseller4 because: (no reason given)
LINK
Uploaded by WiscJobsNow on Sep 7, 2011