It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by g0dhims3lf
This philosophy lacks substance and sounds too much like arrogance. I take pride in the achievements of others as well as my own because we are all working off of each-others knowledge. I agree one must first come to know themselves before they can think for themselves but should not solely take pride in their achievements because any achievement made was a result of what they learned up to that point. Like this philosophy for example I hope you also take pride in the fact that someone came up with what you now use to guide your life (not that you do but if you did).edit on 8-8-2012 by g0dhims3lf because: added input
Originally posted by arpgme
reply to post by artistpoet
What motivated you to harm the person? Is it because you feel "Lack" (Jealousy) somewhere? Is it because you want to "prove" something by attacking back?
If you harm someone then love yourself, what is done is done, there is no reason to be stressing over something you can not change.
If you just like hurting people, why do you feel this desire (lack) where you are compensating whatever "void" with hurting others??
Fill the void/lack/desire with self-love and it will change you from the inside out (Feelings to Action), rather than the outside in (Action to feelings)
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
It's obvious that this is another one of arpgme's ideas. No offense, OP, but it's hard to take your ideas seriously when you bounce around different ones so quickly. I remember awhile ago when you had your Ask A Stoic Anything thread, claiming to be a Stoic. I have yet to see evidence of that, however.
Originally posted by arpgme
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
It's obvious that this is another one of arpgme's ideas. No offense, OP, but it's hard to take your ideas seriously when you bounce around different ones so quickly. I remember awhile ago when you had your Ask A Stoic Anything thread, claiming to be a Stoic. I have yet to see evidence of that, however.
This is why I should be taken as a serious philosophy, I try out new perspectives of realities and sometimes even ones that contradict to see which one is most naturalist and universal...
A person is always growing and gaining more wisdom, and their perspective may change as well, sometimes, a person will go to a "seemly stupid" perspective, to see if it actually is, or if there is something amazing behind it.
Originally posted by arpgme
This philosophy looks very interesting. It is called Autamorism. I guess it is true, that if I feel like crap and someone compliments me, it is up to me to self evaluate myself, because even if someone compliments me I still may feel like crap; so it makes sense that you have to love yourself, then the insults won't hurt as bad and the compliments would just be something that you already know about yourself. What do you think?
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
Even wanting that title of a "serious philosophy" (your words, not mine) just strengthens the Ego's false sense of identification by giving it more belonging and entitlement.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Self-Love teaches to serve the self at the cost of others. You will always put yourself first and highest. In fact, society is dangerously close to this practice already.
This is the definition of evil...for me, anyway.edit on 8-8-2012 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)